Correspondence
Between Former Focus on the Family Employee and Focus on the Family
|
The following letter was sent to Dr. James Dobson on 3-7-01. I was told on 3-19-01, by Focus on the Family VP, Tom Minnery, that Dr. Dobson will never see the letter. It is "too long" and "too preachy." In order to be true to the Word of God, and my own conscience and convictions I must send this letter to you. I was fired 3-22-01 (from Focus on the Family) for writing this letter, so YOU must carry the torch! Tom Minnery is heading the alliance with Mormons, Muslims, etc. Do what you can to keep Focus from making this gigantic mistake! Call me at home if you have any questions or comments: The phone # for Focus is 1-800-232-6459, or 1-719-531-3400. Ask for Tom Minnery. Ask him if they are still planning to hold a global alliance conference (with the enemies of the Cross) at the Focus Campus in Colorado Springs. God bless you!!!!! Brian V. Cooper Jesus is Lord! 3-7-01 Dr. James Dobson Brian Cooper Dear Dr. Dobson,
Focus is acting like politics are
more important than Truth. The Campaign for Righteousness says that our #1
mission is to introduce people to Christ. In the past, the ministry has
refused to reach out to the cults for "fear of offending them."
Now we are going to endorse them? If we can do a broadcast on Messianic
Judaism, we can do a program designed to reach those trapped in the
snare of the cults. Jesus said to
leave the 99 safe sheep, and go after the one that has fallen into the
pit. If the temporal (politics) has become more important that the eternal
(Truth) then why not change the name of our mission statement to the
"Campaign for Republicans," it would be more accurate. I
understand that we are also working with Catholic groups. As a Protestant,
I "protest" some of their doctrines, but the LDS and Catholics
are apples and oranges! The LDS have NO ORTHODOX THEOLOGY! NONE! 9 Anyone that goes too far and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God; the one who abides in the teaching, he has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house, and do not give him a greeting. 11 for the one who gives him a
greeting participates in his evil deeds." 15 Or what harmony has Christ with Belial, or what has a believer in common with an unbeliever? 16 Or what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; just as God said, "I will dwell in them and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 17 "Therefore, come out from
their midst and be separate,'' says the Lord. "and do not touch what
is unclean; and I will welcome you." 11 Does a fountain send out from the same opening both fresh and bitter water? 12 Can a fig tree, my brethren, produce olives, or a vine produce figs? Nor can salt water produce fresh. 13 Who among you is wise and understanding? Let him show by his good behavior his deeds in the gentleness of wisdom. 14 But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your heart, do not be arrogant and so lie against the truth. 15 This wisdom is not that which
comes down from above, but is earthly, natural, and "demonic." 34 "You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks out of that which fills the heart. 35 "The good man brings out of his good treasure what is good; and the evil man brings out of his evil treasure what is evil. 36 "But I tell you that
every careless word that people speak, they shall give an accounting for
it in the day of judgment." 7 which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we, or an angel (Moroni?)
from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have
already preached to you, he is to be accursed!" 12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you have need again for someone to teach you the elementary principles of the oracles of God, and you have come to need milk and not solid food. 13 For everyone who partakes only of milk is not accustomed to the word of righteousness, for he is an infant. 14 But solid food is for the
mature, who because of practice have their senses trained to discern good
and evil." …I know your deeds and your toil and perseverance, and that you cannot tolerate evil men, and you put to the test those who call themselves (LDS?) apostles, and they are not, and you found them to be false; 3 and you have perseverance and have endured for My name's sake, and have not grown weary. 4 "But I have this against you, that you have left your first love. 5 "Therefore remember from
where you have fallen, and repent and do the deeds you did at first; or
else I am coming to you and will remove your lampstand out of its place
unless you repent… He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says
to the churches."
Brian V. Cooper Footnote by ESN: 1 Refers to Ryan Dobson, son of Dr. Dobson. Ryan is a member of the Council for National Policy (CNP) Youth Council. He is also an employee of the Family Research Council. The Council for National Policy is mentioned several times in Let's Focus in on "Focus on the Family". Also read 10-18-03 letter to ESN, Ryan Dobson is More Than Meets the Eye and 1-8-04 letter, Did James Dobson Try to Cover Up Who Ryan Dobson Married? Brian's 2nd Letter to Focus: 7-16-01 Dr. James Dobson Dear Tom Minnery, B) God had sex with the Virgin Mary to "sire" His one and only Son in the flesh! (Mormon Doctrine, Pg. 546-547) C) There are many Gods! (History of the Church, Vol. 6, Pg. 305-306) D) Jesus killed people by the thousands! (III Nephi 9:1-15) E) Black skin is a curse from God! (II Nephi 5:21) F) Salvation by works! (Article of Faith #3) G) Baptism for the dead! (Doctrine and Covenants, 124:28-36) H) All other churches are of the Devil! (I Nephi 14:10) I) God said: All other churches
beliefs are an abomination to Him! (Pearl of Great Price / History of
Joseph Smith, Pg. 49) II Corinthians 6:14-17, says, "Do not be bound together with unbelievers; for what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness, or what fellowship has light with darkness? 15 Or what harmony has Christ with Belial, or what has a believer in common with an unbeliever?... 17 "Therefore, Come out from their midst and be separate," says the Lord." Ephesians 5:6-11, says, "Let
no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath
of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. 7 Therefore do not be
partakers with them... 11 Do not participate in their unfruitful deeds of
darkness, but instead even expose them." "Do not be bound
together with unbelievers in the World Congress of Families!" Brian's 3rd Letter to Focus on the Family 10-2-01 Dr. James Dobson Dear Dr. Dobson, Greetings in the Name of my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. I trust that this letter finds you seeking His will for your life and for Focus on the Family. It is with a heavy heart that I write to you again Dr. Dobson. As you know, I wrote you a letter on 3-7-01 asking you to reconsider Focus’ involvement with the Mormon Church (as well as Muslims and Hindus) by joining the World Congress of Families (WCOF). Since then, you have even had these groups (Mormons/Muslims/Hindus) on the Focus campus for several Planning Committee Meetings. I know this to be true, because we picketed Focus during some of these meetings, and actually talked with several members of the WCOF. Then finally, on the last day of the conference (only after we picketed the meetings, passed out several hundred letters and videotaped the WCOF) Focus reluctantly admitted to the employees and to the public, that you had been meeting with Mormons, Muslims and Hindus on the Focus campus, to discuss strategy for lobbying the United Nations. As you know, I (and many Focus employees) believe that this Alliance is a violation of the Scriptural mandate in II Corinthians 6:14-17 to
"not be unequally yoked with unbelievers," as well as James 4:4,
II John 10-11 and many others. But this is not a personal issue to me...
it is a doctrinal issue. For some reason, you seem to want to make this
personal. I have never attacked you personally. We are fighting the
Alliance, not you. Privately, many Focus employees have been bad-mouthing
anyone who spoke out against the Alliance, but now you and your employees
are taking this attack to a higher (lower?) level by attacking me
personally in public. What you say about me behind closed doors is of no
concern to me, but when you malign my character to the public, I must draw
the line. This is a typical ad-hominem attack (if you can’t deal with
the message, attack the messenger). In the attached letter being sent out
by Focus (and approved by you) Focus made these comments: Thirdly, I also am not
"seeking controversy for controversy’s sake." There are
hundreds of Focus employees that feel the same way I do. There are also
thousands outside of the Focus empire that believe the Alliance is
Scripturally bankrupt. So to insinuate that the Alliance with Mormons,
Muslims and Hindus is a non-issue is an outright deception. Brian V. Cooper Since
being fired from Focus for fighting this unholy Alliance, Focus has
gone out of their way to try to personalize the issue, as if it was them
against me. That is another common tactic called an ad hominem attack. If
you can’t deal with the issue, attack the messenger. They have also
instructed their hired guns to threatened me not to even talk about it
“in private,” unless I relay the facts as Focus sees them! When will
they see that it is not a personal issue, it is a Biblical issue? Reed & Brown LLP Stephen W. Reed October 8, 2001 RE: False Statements about
Focus on the Family Dear Mr. Cooper: As you are aware we are attorneys for Focus on the Family. I am in possession of a transcript of your recent interview with Dr. Larry Bates on September 28, 2001 during which you made numerous demonstrably false statements concerning Focus on the Family, several members of its staff, and the manner in which your employment was terminated at Focus on the Family. The purpose of this letter is to demand that you refrain from making such false statements, whether publicly or in private. During the Bates interview you claimed that “one of the reasons why... I was let go was that I violated company policy by writing this letter to Dr. Dobson.” As you are well aware, that is plainly false. You were terminated for violating a direct instruction prohibiting you from sending company-wide e-mail messages. Focus on the Family employs over 1200 people and only limited, pre-approved e-mail messages are permitted to be sent to all employees. Your termination was for insubordination - not for attempting to communicate your grievances to the president. In your Bates interview you also claim that Focus on the Family “evidently” believes Mormons are evangelical. You know that Focus holds no such belief. You have substantially mischaracterized the participation of Focus on the Family in the World Congress of Families. You have claimed that “in this Alliance, one of the foundational tenets of this Alliance is that you cannot share your faith.” Of course, that is an intentional distortion and mischaracterization of the World Congress of Families. Publications of the World Congress of Families makes it clear that the WCF is not a structure seeking to unify the world’s pro-family and pro-life organizations under its guidance and control; it is not an “ecumenical” campaign seeking to advance its agenda by doctrinal compromise; and it is not an effort at crafting a “one world religion.” In contrast, WCF announces that it is a practical effort to build greater understanding and encourage informal networks among family advocates at the national and international levels. Further, WCF announces that it is a coalition of the most orthodox believers within each denomination, church, or faith group, persons who are the least likely to compromise their core beliefs. Your characterization of the World Congress of Families can only be described as disingenuous. With respect to the letter you wrote to Dr. Dobson, you have claimed during the Bates interview that your vice president, Tom Minnery, told you “Dr. Dobson will never see the letter. It’s too long and it’s too preachy.” This is a further example of your misleading and dishonest statements about Focus on the Family and your former supervisors. Mr. Minnery told you to shorten the letter and remove some of the erroneous material. You chose to ignore his advice. Your statements concerning your termination which you made to Dr. Bates were not simply false - they were fraudulent. In response to Bate’s question about whether you were trying to get your job back, you stated: “Well, I couldn’t go back cause see, if they didn’t fire me, I was going to quit anyway because I couldn’t stay because of this Alliance being formed.” As you are aware, you told your former supervisor that you didn’t want to quit because if you did you couldn’t get unemployment insurance. You really ought to get your story straight. You have claimed that “the gentlemen that fired me was actually the head of the Alliance and this Alliance - the World Congress of Families - was his pet project.” You know that Mr. Minnery served only as 1 of 30 members of the planning committee. Perhaps your most baseless and false statement made during your interview with Bates was the claim you made concerning Rev. Adrian Rogers, a member of the Focus Board of Directors. You have manufactured out of whole cloth the statements that you have attributed to Tom Minnery concerning Rev. Rogers. Your characterization of Rev. Rogers is false, misleading and can only be interpreted as an attempt to justify your own views. While you are certainly entitled to your own personal views, you are not entitled to project those onto others nor to attribute your views to other people. Focus on the Family is saddened
that you have felt compelled to misrepresent in this fashion the facts
of your employment at the Ministry. Your misstatements and demonstrable
falsehoods disserve our Lord and are quite evidently inconsistent with
the theological position you claim to represent. Furthermore, false
statements of this nature by you, and by those who know them to be
false, can be construed as defamatory or libelous, and as such can be
actionable in a court of law. Reed & Brown LLP Stephen Reed 11-7-01 Steve Reed Dear Mr. Reed: I am in receipt of your letter dated 10-8-01. I apologize for taking so long to respond, but I have been out of state looking for a job. I must say that you have me at a distinct disadvantage in that I do not possess a transcript of the broadcast where I was interviewed by former Tennessee Congressman, Dr. Larry Bates on 9-28-01. So until I receive a copy of the transcript or an audio cassette, I will have to simply respond to your accusations in your letter the best that I can. I can easily document all of my statements, except your accusation that I said, "I believe that Focus must think that Mormons are Evangelical." From my memory of the interview, that statement was made by Dr. Bates, not me. But like I said, I will have to hear the audio cassette before I can respond more definitively on that issue. But please allow me to address the other six accusations you made, in the order that they were raised. 1) I was not fired for sending the letter to Dr. Dobson, instead I was fired for the e-mail? I must refer you to the enclosed "letter of termination" sent to me by Tom Minnery, dated 3-22-01. Tom said that I was terminated because Colorado is an "at will" labor state. Which means, and I quote from the Focus on the Family Employee Handbook, "You may be terminated without notice and without cause." But Tom went on to give the reasons for my termination anyway. He gave the following three reasons: One: Because I violated Focus policy in October of 1999 when I protest Fred Phelps (off of Focus property and on my own time on a Saturday). You remember that ordeal, don't you, Steve? That was the first time you threatened to sue me for "lying about my employers." They had officially charged me with "treating a guest improperly" and threatened to fire me if I ever did that again. As you may remember, the "guest" was Fred Phelps! He never stepped foot on Focus property that day (and neither did I), but Focus claimed that he was their "guest." I suppose you could say that... as long as you consider the sidewalk counselors to be "guests" of Planned Parenthood. Fred Phelps had signs that said "GOD HATES FAGS" and "FAGS CAN'T REPENT" and "DOBSON SCREWS FAGS." I had a sign that quoted scripture. But because I "put the ministry at risk" of some bad PR, they falsely accused me of "treating a guest improperly." Two: Because I "attempted to circumvent my chain of command." This is Tom's way of saying that I had no right to send that letter to Dr. Dobson without his prior approval. Hence, my statement that I was fired for writing the letter to Dr. Dobson. Three: For sending an e-mail (just a copy of the letter to Dr. Dobson) to some of my friends, that Tom claimed "violated published policies at Focus." Firstly, I did not send a ministry wide e-mail. That is another fabrication (like "treating a guest improperly"). But even if I did send a ministry wide e-mail, there are no "published policies" against that. Nowhere in the Employee Handbook does it EVER state that employees cannot send ministry wide e-mails. I have seen MANY employees do just that, and not one of them ever got fired for it. The only reason that I sent the e-mail to a few of my friends was that I figured that after Tom had just thrown me out of his office, that I was already terminated. I figured that if I didn't send it then, I may never have the chance to see them again. 2) WCOF members can share their faith with other members? As you well know, Steve, all we did was quote the WCOF website, where it said "All theological differences must be set aside," and "must take a back seat." Your insinuation that all members were free to share their faith openly is not true, in any sense of the word. Do you honestly think that a Muslim is going to sit still while someone preaches from the Bible, or prays in Jesus name? Come on, Steve. Muslims are the number one killers of Christians around the world. The Hindus come in a close second. And these are the people that Focus had on their campus, along with Mormons and others. The Mormons teach that all other churches are "of the Devil." The Muslims say that all other religions are "Infidels." Rabbi Lapin (who is a member, and was present at Focus for the Planning Committee meeting) has said that Messianic Jews are "apostate." One of the Mormon members of the Alliance, David Dollahite, told me that he remembers having to ask for a "moment of silence" before a meal, to "not offend some of our guests." Steve, that was on the Focus campus! What do you think it will be like when they all get to the U.N.? It will be worse, not better. 3) Tom would have sent the letter on to Dr. Dobson if I would have shortened it? This statement was made many times by Tom in my unemployment hearing. Fortunately, my boss, Jimmy Peck, was present in the original meeting where Tom claims to have made this "offer." Jimmy stated under oath that Tom NEVER made that statement. Ask Jimmy why Tom said he intercepted my private mail to Dr. Dobson. He distinctly said, "It's too long, too preachy, and has too many inaccuracies." As you may know, the letter was about five pages long, and was mostly just me quoting scriptures that testified that forming alliances with unbelievers was wrong. Tom wanted the letter to have been a paragraph at the most! He said, "If you would have come to me first, I would have helped you write the letter." He never said, "If you will shorten it a bit, I'll send it to Dr. Dobson." Tom seems to be having a bout with historic revisionism. 4) I told my employer that I did not want to quit, in order to collect unemployment? This is a new one on me. This is the first time that I have heard this accusation. At no time did I ever make such a statement to anyone. Please feel free to let me know who my accuser is. Thank you. 5) Tom is the head of Alliance? This is just a misunderstanding on your part. As I said before, I don't have a copy of the tape, so I must trust that you are quoting the statement accurately and in context (against my better judgment). My statement was referring to the fact that Tom Minnery was the head of the Alliance for Focus. Not the head of the entire WCOF or even head of the Planning Committee. 6) Adrian Rogers agreed with the Alliance? I doubt that very much. From what I know of Adrian Rogers he would not support such an unbiblical Alliance. A friend of mine is a good friend of Adrian Rogers and he said, "Adrian would NEVER endorse this unholy Alliance." But those are just opinions. I based my remarks on statements made by, none other than Tom Minnery, himself. Tom made the following declarations on 3-19-01, in a meeting with Jimmy Peck and me: "First of all, I have never sent Dr. Dobson something this long, whenever I send him something I try to say it in one paragraph. And the reason is the guy's got such a stack and he'll never read it if I send something that goes four or five pages with two attachments. Um, and secondly you know most of what this is... preachin'." Cooper: "Yeah, it's scripture." Minnery: "And, yeah, I mean, you're not telling him anything he doesn't already believe from the bottom of his heart. Cooper: "Then how can you believe those scriptures and go ahead and align with the enemies of the cross? Minnery: "Well, uh, we discussed this thoroughly at our Executive Cabinet and a lot of good points made and then we took it to the board and we discussed it thoroughly at the board and uh, Adrian Rogers whose with the Southern Baptists is uh, one of the strongest separationists there are and he gave some pretty good reasons, and uh, so there's a lot more to this than you know about and had you asked me about it I would have told ya uh, but you didn't. Ya know, you just sent this to Dr. Dobson. And uh, you're focusing entirely on the Mormons here, but you make it sound like we're aligning ourselves with Mormons. It's actually worse than that. I mean, we're aligning ourselves with Mormons, Hindus, Jews, and uh, Muslims, as well as other Christians. This is not a theological battle we're fighting here obviously because we have different theologies. We don't talk about theology. We're trying to preserve the traditional definition of the family within the United Nations. We're trying to pull a lot of people who believe in uh, religious...religious tenets about the family that we can agree with and point them toward uh, the United Nations. It's not, you know... uh... the Mormons have, have been doing this now for quite some time. We're just now beginning to pay attention as Evangelicals and uh, Evangelicals who have been paying attention to these issues are saying, "Great! We're glad you're there. We need an Evangelical voice for the Evangelical church. We're happy you're there." So, um, that's the kind of thing we talked about at the board meeting. So, you, you made it sound like, uh, we're uh, we'll be working with the LDS Mormon Church on political issues...well, officially working, well, I don't know, I wouldn't, I wouldn't call it officially. I mean there's no letterhead that's gonna have their name and our name on it. Uh, we're trying to organize the World Congress on the Family and we may have it in a Muslim country. 'Cause the Muslims are members of the United Nations. And they are tremendous fighters against uh, homosexuals." Cooper: "And tremendous fighters against the Gospel. And they're the number one murderers of Christians in the world. And to, to fight on a different issue and overlook those kind of issues... you can't have... There is no biblical basis for that kind of a compromise." Minnery: "Oh, I disagree, and uh, uh" Cooper: "Based on what though? Minnery: "Well, I'm not going to get into an argument with you here at this meeting. I just want to explain to you why uh, why this letter didn't go to Dr. Dobson, because that was your question. Uh, you raise good issues. The issues are the same issues have been raised at Executive Cabinet and they've been raised at the Board. (by Adrian Rogers?) But you're not a good, you're not a good vehicle to voice that, because uh, you overwrite and you preach and you don't have facts that are accurate." So as you can see by the statements made by Tom, himself, all of my statements are accurate and documented. But since we are on the subject of slander and libel, please let me inform you of what Focus is saying about me in print (as well as on the radio):
Firstly, no one, including me, has ever accused Focus of entering in to a "merger" with anyone. That is a strawman argument. We have only called the WCOF what it is... an Alliance. As you know, the Mission Statement of the WCOF says that anyone who participates must "set their theological differences aside" and that all "differences" must "take a back seat." We believe that the only thing we have to offer this world is salvation by Grace through faith in Jesus Christ. If you are barred from sharing the Gospel with the members of the WCOF, then you really have nothing to contribute. Secondly, I am not "angry, resentful, and eager to hurt" anyone. In case you have forgotten the chronology of events... I wrote the letter to Focus while I was still employed at Focus. I did not get fired from Focus for an unrelated issue and then write an "angry and resentful" letter. I wrote Dr. Dobson a loving letter of warning (regarding the issue of the WCOF and forming alliances with the enemies of God) and then they fired me. Trust me, because of all of the compromise and deception that I have seen over the years, I am as glad to be gone from Focus as they are to have me gone. Thirdly, I also am not "seeking controversy for controversy's sake." There are hundreds of Focus employees that feel the same way I do. There are also thousands outside of the Focus empire that believe the Alliance is Scripturally bankrupt. So to insinuate that the Alliance with Mormons, Muslims and Hindus is a non-issue is an outright deception. Fourthly, to state that "There is nothing to his charges," is simply fallacious. I have never "charged" Focus of anything but joining the WCOF. If I have ever "charged" Focus of doing anything that they did not do, please let me know of the specific errors, rather than allowing Focus to whitewash with such a broad brush. And finally, I did not "shout anti-Focus messages" to anyone. All I said was to pray for Focus, then to call Focus and ask them to repent of the Alliance with Mormons, Muslims and Hindus. Besides, most of my dialogue was with Focus employees. Regarding the issue of me wearing a Devil costume... that's D-R-A-M-A! The sign I had said, "Focus is Dancing with Me Now." The only days that I wore that costume, were the days that Focus had Mormons, Muslims and Hindus on the Focus campus. It is my opinion that aligning with these non-Christians is "Dancing with the Devil." So, Steve, when it comes to slanderous or libelous statements, you better have Focus clean up their own back yard, before you come over to mine. I can document EVERY statement that I have made. They cannot. In Jesus, Brian V. Cooper PS Tom Minnery recently made the
accusation on nationwide live radio (10-2-01) that I was being
disingenuous by allowing my wife to continue working at Focus (if I
thought that they had defiled the ministry by joining the Alliance, and
having them meet on the Focus campus). First of all, I am the head of my
home... not a dictator. If and when she decided to leave, that would be up
to her (she quit within minutes of hearing Tom Minnery berate our family
on the radio). Secondly, she had made the decision to fight the Alliance
from within (Focus), whereas I chose to fight it from the outside. And
lastly, since they chose to hire three attorneys to keep me from
collecting unemployment (after serving the Lord faithfully at Focus for
almost five years), it was an economic necessity. Read: Transcription
of the 3-19-01 Meeting between Tom Minnery, Brian Cooper and Jimmy Peck CONCLUSION: So where do we go from here? What should we do as the Church? First, we must go to our brother in private, as instructed in Matthew 18. If FOF will not listen, then we must go to them with a brother. If they still will not listen, then we must take it to the Church, as a whole. That is what this booklet is all about. We have gone to FOF in private, then with several brothers, and now, we are taking the issue to you, the Church. When Jesus taught the parable of “The Pearl of Great Price,” He was referring to heaven. Sell all you possess... do whatever it takes... to inherit the “pearl” of eternal life. We cannot assign motives, but it appears that FOF believes that the Pearl of Great Price is “political power.” Psalm 1:1 says, "Blessed is the man that walks not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor stands in the path of sinners, nor sits in the seat of the scoffers." The World Congress of Families and the United Nations are both full of ungodly scoffers whose path leads to destruction. If Focus does not repent, they may find themselves in the position of King Saul; still holding a position of authority, but no longer anointed. ... Only God knows who will replace them. Our hope and prayer is that they will repent and disavow the ungodly Alliance and re-submit to the Word of God. If you are an employee or supporter of FOF and Dr. Dobson, you have a duty and a responsibility to give them/him Godly counsel. Guard your heart against becoming more of a "Dobsonite" than a Christian. Dr. Dobson is a fallible man just like you and me, and he and Focus have made a mistake that is easily corrected. You must be willing to "speak the truth in love," no matter what it may cost you. If you do call FOF, remember to tell them what God told Saul in I Samuel 15:22, "To obey is better than sacrifice." We must do God’s Will, God’s Way! Brian Cooper Meeting between Tom Minnery, Brian Cooper and Jimmy Peck (Minnery admits to the Alliance with Mormons, Muslims, etc.) Is Focus on the Family Going in an Unscriptural, Ecumenical, New Age Direction? (articles) Let's Focus in on "Focus On The Family" (Transcription of two tapes)
|