| S.E.P. was always pushed as the ultimate
experience for the youth in Worldwide Church of God. How much of that
was true? How many "character building camps" in
Herbert
Armstrong splinter groups offer similar results?

Ever wonder why WCG members
were taught that it was best for their children to attend S.E.P. around
12 years of age and then try to put in for another session when they
were a little older? Perhaps the reason was because the younger they
were, the more influence the camp leaders (who received their program
material from headquarters) would have on these adolescents and the more
indoctrination into the WCG belief system could hopefully be
accomplished in their innocent minds. If your child was 17, it was almost
considered too late to attend S.E.P. It was the young mind that needed
to be molded and reached with the idea that Herbert W. Armstrong was
"God's Apostle," and that they were "the leaders of the World
Tomorrow."
If they got with the program
and did it right at S.E.P., they were told that they could become the
cream of the crop and be able to attend "God's college"--AC.
First, though, they would have to hid out with their parents in the
caves of Petra for 3 l/2 years, dutifully doing their Y.E.S., lessons
and obediently attending services every day with their parents. (Yes,
members were told they would be attending church seven days a week in
Petra.) Then, and only then, would they would be allowed to be
"leaders in the World Tomorrow." What happened after that was
never very clear. However, most of us remember that they were promised
grapes as big as peaches (along with all other fruit increased
five-fold), and their own pet lion.
S.E.P. was kind of like a kid's
"feast," except it was geared toward that which would produce
cooperation, discipline, courage, tenacity, and leadership. And this was
mainly attempted through many different kinds of sports. But like the
Feast of Tabernacles they were kept so busy (and exhausted) that they
rarely, if ever, had time to just sit and relax, doing absolutely
nothing. That would have been "laziness." Even on the Sabbath,
no matter how hot it was, or how tired they were, they had to dress up
in suits, ties, nylons and dresses and pay attention to their
instructors. Few had time to write home to their parents or friends to
tell them what a "fun time" they were having. WCG made sure
there was a true control of their environment and they structured every
last minute of it.
What were the parents told
about these camps? That their child needed to attend because it would be
a vital link to his/her staying in "God's church" and growing
up in the "World Tomorrow." Just as importantly, it would give
their child a "good attitude," and "round out his/her
personality." Those families who didn't have the money to send
their child were usually given "assistance" from a special fund donated to
by the more wealthy members.
While the parents conversed
among themselves that "their child" was going to get to go to
S.E.P, or had just got back from it, it was usually the minister's
children, or the elder's or the deacon's, that made a show about how
many times they had went and what all they had learned. How
many children really came back from S.E.P. changed for the better? Did
they come back more dedicated and determined to go "God's way"
(the WCG way)? Were they now closer to their parents, more obedient,
more respectful, more communicative? Or just momentarily changed? Was
"God's camp" all that it was cracked up to be? Did it produce
model students with impeccable manners and a vision of the "World
Tomorrow" burning in their hearts? Did it produce children that
went on to become full-fledged members in the WCG? In other words,
non-thinking, dependent, group-oriented, smiling members that would do anything
for the WCG? Or was it just one more WCG mind-experiment2
that never
delivered the promised goods?1
I'm sure there are parents that
remember children like Curtis and Charlie3
whose parents sent them to S.E.P. because they felt it would be the best
thing in the world for them. Curtis was almost out of high school, but
the minister let him go because he felt it might do him good and remove
some of his "rebellious nature." Curtis will never forgot how
he feared he was going to drown when he went under the water while being
pulled on water skis (he didn't know how to swim, but all had to
participate in every sport). All he remembers of a fun time was when he
and some of the other boys (on the drive up to S.E.P.) ran and hid in
the woods half the night, laughing with flashlights, instead of staying
in their tents. I guess the parents missed that adventure.
Charlie went to S.E.P. at a
young age. He was kept so busy with activities that he didn't have
time--nor energy--to write home. A quiet child, his parents don't
remember him having much to say about his experience. They do remember
that while they waited breathlessly at the airport for his plane to
arrive, wondering what exciting knowledge he gained and what new mood
they would encounter, that he exited the plane with a grouchy look on
his face and with a splitting headache. He ended up sleeping in every
day for a week to make up for all the lack of rest he encountered at
S.E.P.
Both Curtis and Charlie
struggled for years with a low self-worth, not knowing it was caused
because they couldn't measure up to their parents'/WCG's unrealistic
standards.
Is this what kind of camp we
would have chosen to send our children to if we had known what it was all
about? Would we have chosen exploitation for ourselves and for our
children if we had truly known what was behind WCG? Our family should be
our
most precious treasure. Do they need to be controlled, stifled, manipulated
and molded into what we want? (and what WCG wanted?) Or do we
want them to grow up to embrace their own interests and be able to
identify their own talents, becoming independent, creative, loving and
happy people? Thousands of children had their lives taken from them by growing
up in WCG. How many thousands more are having the same thing happen
by the control of parents/leaders in Armstrong
splinter groups, such as Philadelphia
Church of God, Living Church
of God, and other
similar authoritarian organizations with their own "character
building youth camps"?
May we, as parents, develop a
loving, lasting relationship with our children, based on unconditional
love, communication and proper spiritual guidance, before it is too late.
By Marissa
May 28, 2003
Exit & Support Network™
Footnotes:
1
One identifying trait of high deceptive,
exploitive groups is that they never
deliver what they promise; i.e., happiness, success, good health, happy
children and marriages.
2
It is
alleged that many groups known as "cults" are fronts for a hidden agenda
and work together to create a passive people. Is it any wonder they
have similar methods of deception, manipulation, abuse, and related goals? Author Alex Constantine has stated:
"That cults are dangerous has been proven time and again. That they are
often fronts for intelligence activity is indisputable (as anyone who has
dug into researching CIA mind control experimentation knows full well)." Read
more about this and WCG / HWA activities from OIU Newsletter #6.
3
All names have been changed.
Back
to Stories About S.E.P. Experiences
Articles For Those Who Were Emotionally and Spiritually Abused
Return
to top |