When one claims to hold a
special, elected office, how do we prove that
person is speaking the truth? I thought I'd share some of the methods
that
I had used to PROVE to myself that HWA was, indeed, "God's True Apostle."
- He was God's Apostle because
an AC graduate told me so. How many of us, when we
first entered Worldwide Church of
God, actually knew what an apostle was??? I sure
didn't. I had to ask this same Ambassador College graduate to explain what that
meant. He told me that Herbert W. Armstrong was "God's chosen
end-time Apostle" and how the Bible prophesied of his coming.
He was the "end-time Elijah" who would lead us to the
Place of Safety before God's Kingdom could be established.
- He was God's Apostle because
the minister's wife told me he was. She said that the Bible
even prophesied his name! She quoted Jeremiah 21:5 "with a
strong arm," and said it was actually "Armstrong"
backwards! Doesn't it make sense that God would give the names of
all His prophets in the Bible? "Wow! Incredible!" I
thought, "Amazing how this Scripture, which was written
thousands of years ago, could be so accurate in naming
Herbert Armstrong
as a future apostle.
- He was God's Apostle because
the ministers said so. I listened with rapt attention as the
ministers expounded upon God's Government and how it was from the
top down: God was at the top, Jesus Christ was next, then Herbert W.
Armstrong. Then it flowed down to the evangelists, regional
directors, ministers, elders
and deacons.
- He was God's Apostle because
he met with world leaders. God opened the doors for HWA to meet
world leaders and preach the gospel, I was told. He was to
"preach the gospel to the world as a witness, then The End will
come." And he was the only man on the face of the earth today
that was doing this.
- He was divinely appointed by
God because his autobiography said so. The dream that Loma Armstrong had about
the three angels was positive proof that they were handpicked by
God. [Read: WCG and Their Myths About Loma Armstrong which describes this dream.]
- I believed it because
everybody around me believed it. There were doctors, lawyers and
teachers attending. I thought that if it got past them, and they
found it to be true, then it had to be true.
So that is how I proved that
HWA was "God's Apostle." I believed it because I was told it was true
by other people who were under HWA's employment! I believed it because
HWA printed literature that said this was true. Is that how you
came to believe that he was "God's Apostle?"
Now let's go back and
examine these points:
#1 He was God's Apostle
because an AC graduate told me so. I didn't know what an apostle
was, so I believed what I was told instead of finding out for myself. I
didn't know that apostles were those who had received their commission
directly from Jesus (Gal. 1:1), personally saw Jesus Christ after His
resurrection, expounded and wrote Scripture (John 14:26; 16:13; Gal.
1:11-12) and had the power to work miracles (Mark 6:13; Luke 9:1-2; Acts
2:43). That is how Peter, James, and Paul and the other disciples became
apostles. They were personally instructed by Jesus and had the badge of
an apostle. Knowing that, I failed to ask, "How did Mr. Armstrong
obtain the title of Apostle? How was he personally instructed by Jesus?
Who appointed it to him? If God appointed this title to him, when and
how did this happen?"
I accepted HWA's "apostleship"
without further investigation. What about credentials? Does it stand to
reason that a man without a theology degree can make up his own
theology? I never checked to see if HWA had any degrees or any
qualifications to teach the Bible. If one were having brain surgery,
doesn't one make sure of the surgeon's qualifications? Or does one check
out his qualifications and credentials? If you won't hand over your
physical life to a surgeon who isn't qualified, then why do you hand
over your eternal life without closely checking out who your spiritual
leader is?
#2. He was God's Apostle
because the minister's wife told me was. Did the verse in Jeremiah
21:5 really prove HWA by name? One only needs to read
other translations to find out the word "strong" can be
translated as "mighty," so a "strong arm" could
easily be translated as "mighty arm." So this verse proves
nothing. When you read the verse in context, it further proves that this
was taken out of context. In fact, all the prophets of God are called by
name in the Bible (Elijah, Elisha, Daniel, Isaiah, just to name a few).
If God is calling a modern day prophet to do such an important end time
work, wouldn't it make sense that He would give us his exact name as He
had done in the past? Why should we try to bend a Scripture in order to
extract a name that was never there in the first
place? Does God play these kinds of cryptic "word search" games with
the Scriptures?
#3. He was God's Apostle
because the ministers said so. If the ministers
are trained by HWA, paid by HWA, doesn't it make sense that they are
going
to teach whatever HWA wants them to? They wouldn't hold biased opinions,
would they? How long would they last in the ministry if they said that
D. L. Moody or
Charles Spurgeon, for instance, was also chosen of God? So our belief was
formed only because those over us, who were on Armstrong's payroll, told
us that "it was so"--week after week, year after year.
#4. He was God's Apostle
because he met with world leaders. We were given splashy brochures
entitled, "Herbert W. Armstrong, Ambassador for World
Peace" (not Ambassador for Jesus Christ, nor God the Father for
that matter). The high quality paper stock used in these brochures was
impressive. The photos of HWA with a real live king, queen, or prince
made everything seem so legitimate. But does having one's photograph
taken with a world leader actually make him an "Apostle"? Donating large
sums of tithe money to third world projects, gifts of Steuben crystal,
and the leader's photo on the front cover of the Plain Truth magazine is what
gained him an audience. It was money that opened the doors, not God.
#5. He was Divinely
Appointed by God because his
autobiography said so. I never questioned how someone was actually
appointed by God. Aside from believing what he said about himself in his autobiography, I never delved further into this. Why
did God wait
until 1950 years before "calling" him? Why do other deceptive
"cult"
leaders make the same claim? Who could verify beyond a shadow of a
doubt, that Loma Armstrong wasn't making it up or hallucinating? Haven't
we all had dreams that seem realistic, only to wake up and discover that
it was just that--a dream? Can that be used as "evidence" or
"fact" of one's calling to an apostleship?
#6. I believed it because
everybody around me believed it. I thought the lawyers would have
enough legal savvy to understand whether a group was legitimate or not.
What I didn't know was that everyone around me believed it because they
came to believe it the same way I did! They believed what paid employees
of HWA had to say about him, they believed what Herbert Armstrong said about himself,
and they believed it because 500 other people around them believed it,
too!
Conclusion:
If Herbert Armstrong truly was
God's chosen leader, then he should be "above
reproach." So if he was above reproach, why is there so much
written about him that proves otherwise? I know the old argument:
"David sinned but was a man after God's own heart. And Paul and
Peter sinned, too." Yes, as men they did indeed, but they never
made mistakes in their inspired writings. How many false prophecies has
HWA uttered? (I heard it was
over
200!) How many doctrines were changed?
Why can't "God's Apostle" get it right the first time?
The argument that "Satan
makes up all those lies against God's Apostle just
to get you out of The Church" is another fallacy. Why is it, that
if you or I go to court, or get arrested, and our wrong deeds were
recorded on legal documents or the newspaper, they would be considered
legitimate, truthful information about an event that actually took
place. So if "God's Apostle" goes to court or gets arrested
for drunk driving, and there are actual documents to prove it, why
do we excuse it as "Satan attacking God's Apostle"? Is it
because we want to believe so badly that he is who he says he
is??? Why?
Because it hurts to admit that we could be wrong, but wrong we are! We
have to stop living in denial at some point.
Don't hold on to a man or a
man-made organization. Hold on to Jesus. Jesus
is the only one who can save you! Why would God do away with the
Levitical priesthood and rent the veil so you could have direct
access into the Holy of Holies and the presence of God, (because of the death
of Jesus), only to insert that priesthood between you and Him, 1950
years later??? Does God work this way?
I hope the above information
will help you to learn from my mistakes. May it spare you from the many
false christs that Jesus said would come. The Bible tells us to
investigate claims thoroughly--to enquire and to test--whether these
things are true. Remember, truth disturbs error--truth does not
disturb truth! Don't be afraid to investigate and to prove to
yourself, whether one is a false prophet. Asking questions is not
a sin.
One should not be made to feel that they are questioning God, or lack
faith, or have a "bad attitude." You are making sure that your
eternal destiny lies in safe hands. Nobody should bully or belittle you
for it. God's servants can stand up to any scrutinizing. False prophets
can't.
By Lindsey
Exit & Support Network™
January 12,
2003
Also read:
Why is it Difficult For Exiters to Question Herbert Armstrong?
Principles
of Influence Used in Society /
AUTHORITY (if an expert says it, it must be true)
Note by ESN:
Herbert W. Armstrong
claimed many times that he was "God's Apostle" (a. k. a. "Christ's apostle").
Notice just a few quotes from him (bolding ours):
"I call upon all of you in the name of Jesus Christ,
as God's Apostle, and your Minister, be careful!" (March 29, 1957
Dear Brethren letter)
"Naturally,
it is incumbent on me as God's Apostle, to protect His 'sheepfold'
He has placed under my care." (July 31, 1978 Dear Brethren letter)
"And please
state in your letter, in your own words, that this money is your
endorsement of my apostleship, and the money is to be used for
defending God's Work as I, Christ's Apostle, deem best." (January
14, 1979 Dear Brethren letter)
"The
author, Christ's apostle, can say emphatically that the apostles,
evangelists, pastors and elders could not carry on the work of God
without the loyal backing and continued encouragement of the lay
members." (Mystery
of the Ages,
1985, p. 267)
"And finally,
Christ's apostle sends out monthly a mimeographed
Co-Worker letter to all members and co-workers reporting on progress in
the work, current activities and needs." (Ibid., p. 269)
| "For such are false apostles,
deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of
Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an
angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also
be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be
according to their works." ~ II Corinthians 11:13-14 |
Where Do I Find the "One True Church"?
Did Herbert W. Armstrong
Have God's Truth?
My Position in Christ
(accepted and secure forever)
Back to Looking Back on My Experiences |