Letters From Those Impacted
by WCG, HWA & Offshoots

Best of the Letters for 2009

 

Letter Archives


HWA's Crucial False Teachings:

January 1, 2009

Hello,
Just an email to say thank you for your website exposing HWA's false teachings. As you, I was lured into the very deceptive teachings of this false church for awhile right after being saved.

I studied the HWA and splinter groups' doctrine for about a year (2007 to present), and the Holy Spirit told me to go back to basics and re-read the book of Romans. The light came on in regards to HWA's false teaching about salvation by works and faith. So I'm now attempting to counter these on YouTube.

Here are some of the crucial false teachings I found.

1) They teach a works and faith salvation and claim Christians are under the law, when in fact a born again Christian that is led by the Holy Spirit is under NO law whatsoever and only way to be saved and reconciled to God is by faith in Jesus' atonement.

They teach we are under the law! While the books of Romans, Hebrews, and Galatians sharply rebuke this matter.

Obedience to Gods ways will be a fruit of salvation out of the love of God not via requirements of law.

They do not realize that it is possible to fall from grace. [Gal. 5:4]

We are either acceptable to God based on what we do or on what our Lord Jesus Christ did for us--not a combination of the two. We approach God through Jesus' righteousness not our own.

2) They teach that one is not "born again" until the resurrection. This denied the fact that we are a "new creature in Christ Jesus," our spirit has been changed, sealed by the Holy Spirit and is the righteousness of God (in our spirit); our body and soul (mind, emotions, etc.) is still corrupted.

"For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him." 2 Corinthians 5:20-21 (NKJ)

3) They do not preach the true gospel, they actually mock it and say the gospel is about the coming Kingdom of God first and foremost and do not preach anything about being reconciled to God.

While the Bible tells us to reconcile the world via the gospel, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation, that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation. 2 Corinthians 5:17-19

4) HWA and splinters have a never-ending message of condemnation. Jesus did not come into the world to condemn it, He came to save it. "For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved." John 3:17

HWA and splinters are modern day Pharisees teaching a very deceptive, satanic message designed to destroy one's faith in Jesus' atoning sacrifice and make one fall from grace. Their teachings also hide God's true message of reconciliation to this world and teach of an angry God.

Sincerely yours in Christ Jesus, Shawn



Neil Earle's Book / I Think I'm Going to Be Sick:

February 9, 2009

Regarding Neil Earle and what he's churning out about HWA. I think I'm going to be sick.

I can just see people writing such flowery words for the likes of Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler:

"He was such a nice young man..."
 
A definite white-wash where one must wear their hip waders while reading through this stuff. --Former member from Texas

Comment: While WCG has whitewashed HWA from the beginning of their changes (see our Q&A), Neil Earle has continued the propaganda, leaving little to be said for "transformed by truth." Earle's church's website contains excerpts from a "forthcoming book" he is writing about HWA entitled: Blow the Dust Off Your Bible: Herbert Armstrong and American Popular Religion. See our new article, Neil Earle Whitewashes Hebert Armstrong.



WCG Blends Armstrongism With New Age and Christianity:

February 9, 2009

On the Glendora Church's website (Neil Earle, pastor), I found the Founder's Bio section, where I was not surprised to find glowing testimonials of HWA and fond memories of HWA and Loma. I wasn't impressed. One particular testimonial under "We Remember HWA" caught my eye. It was by Jan Weiner (RN), and she recalls that she had noticed HWA's anger toward others, and that HWA one time "exploded" at her for not spending more of her time with him as his nurse, bringing her to tears. She says that when she and her husband, Scott, approached HWA about this, HWA called her husband a "boy," screaming at him. She also says that she "...had heard of employees who had angered Mr. Armstrong and were never again allowed to speak to him." I find it dismaying that even she excuses HWA's actions, saying, "To me Mr. Armstrong was always very, very human but always very much above board."

Another thing I noticed was that, while trying to pass itself off as a "kinder, gentler" WCG, it was easy to see past the "fluff" of this church that has Christmas programs, Easter programs, and ethnic based special services. I was especially displeased that the site links to Plain Truth Ministries, which is now accepting orders for The Shack, a book that has already been panned by Christian critics as being New Age; and spiritually speaking, is trash and should be avoided.

From trying to blend Armstrongism with New Age and Christianity, WCG must be a very confusing organization, but I believe it's all continuing with HWA's formula of doing whatever it takes to make a buck; and the more confusing the church is, the less likely anyone is to notice its true purpose. --Impacted by Armstrongism

Comment: In reading through these testimonials by those in "important" WCG positions who remembered HWA, it appears that many of them are exaggerated and/or contain myths in order to turn HWA and Loma into something they never were.  


So Much More Going On Than Members Were Aware of:

February 9, 2009

I just read the little blurb on Neil Earle's Glendora Friends Church site about HWA and the RN. She sure let it slip about HWA's true character; i.e., his anger fits when he didn't get his way, his hating to lose at card games, his demands for her time without a thought about how it was affecting her marriage. It was quite telling (whether she realized it or not) about how she had to "get approval" from the chain of command (Tkach Sr. and Ellis LaRavia) to be released from duty, and how she thought she had to resort to the Bible to show these men that there was no command for her to work tirelessly for HWA. She must have been paid very well for her services, because she couldn't come out and tell the truth for what it was: HWA's selfish demands were destroying her marriage, so much so, that she was looking for a replacement that was a single woman. She didn't want to put someone else in the same position. I also thought it was interesting how she admitted to organizing HWA's daily medications, while members were forbidden to seek medical help. It only proves that there was so much more going on than members were ever made aware of. --R. M.

 


Neil Earle and the Masonic Lodge:

February 9, 2009

I was informed a few years ago that Neil Earle was with the Masonic lodge in Glendora, CA back in 1997. This was during the time he was also pastor in Glendora. Whether he's still one, I have no idea. But after reading how he has exonerated HWA, I wonder if he's just another religious fraud himself. --Former WCG member


WCG Using Same Excuse as the Jehovah Witnesses:

February 10, 2009

I find that the WCG is using the same excuse that the Watch Tower Society makes when confronting their past: "Oh, that was the old WCG. That's the past. We're different now." (Wilbur Lingle wrote of this same mindset in the Jehovah's Witnesses when confronted about doctrinal shifts). The JW's claim they are the only organization on earth that has all Truth and their government is directed by Jehovah Himself. Instead of apologizing for the past, they simply say that Jehovah is giving them "New Light." Now where have I heard that one before? --C. G. (Former member of WCG)

Read: All or Nothing Statements (from those that have "the truth") Also read this part about all WCG's "lame" apologies and how a "we have changed" stance can never make up for the deaths, exploitation, and devastation of thousands of adults and helpless children.


No Mention of Meredith Apologizing for His False Prophecy in 1966 PT:

February 10, 2009

Rod Meredith wrote an article ("As 1966 Dawns--Watch These Seven Trends!") in the January 1966 Plain Truth issue that declared that "within 5-10 years" the end would come. That would put it between 1971-1976. I guess we're all still here, and Meredith is still giving his followers the same "5-10 years" spiel. That was same issue after Howard A. sent his controversial question in. [Refer to our article: Neil Earle Whitewashes Herbert Armstrong] HWA apologized for the "oversight" that the "young man on staff" made in his answer to The Passover Plot, but he sure didn't apologize for Meredith's false prophecy which was in that very same issue! --Former WCG member


HWA Tore Pages of Jesus Out of the Bible:

February 10, 2009

I heard this, and I know it's a reliable source. A group of small children at SEP camp gave HWA a Bible when he came to visit. He opened the Bible, and tore out all the pictures of Jesus. Can you imagine what an impression that made on these little ones? And Neil Earle wants us to believe that HWA was Christ-loving and Christ-centered? --R. M. (Former WCG Member)

Comment: Also see: WCG Took Jesus Away From Members.


WCG Never Published a Bible Story Book Based on the New Testament:

February 12, 2009

I would like to add a comment to the letter about HWA tearing out pictures of Jesus from the Bible.

We were taught that having pictures of Christ was tantamount to worshiping an idol. Also we were taught that Christ probably did not look anything like those pictures, since he must have had a very modern, short hair cut. That was the excuse.

However, that did not really answer questions as to why the WWCG never came out with a Children's Bible Story Book based on the New Testament. They could have pictured Jesus from the back. They promised for years that New Testament books were in the works, but they never appeared. Why? Could it have been that they did not want to get the children into the New Testament? What were they afraid of? That is food for thought that I hope every parent will consider. As far as I know, the splinter groups have followed this lead also. --Former WCG & PCG member


Pride is Biggest Obstacle to Acknowledging How Bad it Was in WCG:

February 19, 2009

Unfortunately, regarding Neil Earle's whitewashing of HWA, I'm afraid that happens way too often among even former members of the WCG. My parents and I have been out of the WCG for over 30 years and I've concluded that there is a family dispute regarding the WCG that will never be resolved between my parents and their children.

Although Mom and Dad have renounced Armstrongism and have a relationship with the Lord today, they still insist that our five miserable years in that cult were actually "stepping stones" and "good exposure" and "they got us reading the Bible." They forget that nobody knows the Scriptures better than the devil himself, and cults like Armstrongism are just one of many ways he uses God's Word to turn people away from God's grace through His Son, Jesus.

Although I love my parents and rejoice that we will be spending eternity together because of the grace of God through Christ's shed blood on the cross, I believe human pride is the biggest obstacle to really acknowledging just how bad of an experience it was. Of course I do believe that God triumphed in that experience to bring us to Him, but that certainly doesn't justify the endless number of heresies and deceptions perpetrated by that cult.

The wounds have healed, but the scars remain. And when people let their pride get in the way of seeing the wolf in sheep's clothing for what it was, those of us who were hurt so badly, well, it's like reliving the experience all over again. --R.

Reply: You are so right. Statements such as these hinder, rather than help, those who need to have their experience validated. It is far better for parents to admit the damage that was done.  


Ron Weinland Makes Pure Profit Selling Home Members Built Him:

February 22, 2009

I don't know if you're aware of what Ron Weinland did to the people at the Erie, PA congregation. From what I found out, the members built him a nice home (he got it for free). When housing prices went up, RW sold the home and made pure profit from it. (Just think--even if he sold it for only $100,000, that whole $100K went into his pocket and not the COG-PKG's). The members were very upset over this, and complained to their HQ's. This is why he got transferred to Toledo. --Informed


WCG Experience Turned Many Into Atheists:

April 19, 2009

I was talking with a WCG exiter recently who relayed to me that they always found it disturbing to hear how the WCG experience turned so many into atheists. I agreed, but told them that "the other side of the coin" is: were these people truly a Christian in the first place? How can someone become an atheist that ever knew the true God and Savior? Even though their experience no doubt ended up causing them much confusion and doubt, doesn't Christ promise that they will always be keep safe in His hands? (John 10:28 "And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.")

Simply going through the actions and prescribed rituals (holy days, Passover, etc.) doesn't make anyone a real Christian. There has to be that closeness with Christ that comes through the Holy Spirit. That's one of the reasons why it's plain that HWA taught a false gospel which led to false concepts about the true God and Savior. He tried to take the relationship with Christ out of the lives of the members, and place himself and his "government" in a position of upmost importance in the mind of the believer. I believe that's why he (and other cultic organizations) teach that the Trinity is false. If you have come to know Christ through the Holy Spirit, and have a close relationship with Him through the Holy Spirit (having the "veil" lifted from your eyes so to speak), you don't need any man to interpret the Scriptures for you, and tell you what you should and shouldn't do. --Impacted by loved one in an HWA offshoot

Read: The Spiritual Casualties (and related links at end)


Worldwide Church of God Changes to New Name:

April 21, 2009

I see the old WCG finally found a name that wasn't already taken by somebody else. (Grace Communion International.) A skunk by any other name still stinks. --Former  member of WCG and PCG

Read: Worldwide Church of God Changed Their Name
.


Husband Falls for Restored Church of God Lies:

April 21, 2009

My husband has joined up with David C. Pack's Restored Church of God. He is being treated like a long lost son, and he has totally fallen for Pack's self-centered bragging. If Pack is claiming huge numbers coming to him, he is an outright liar. There are just a few members in this state. I know there used to be more, but evidently they left. My brother and I have been trying to show him how wrong he is, but to no avail. He is convinced at this time that Pack must be the end time Apostle. I do think that Pack is cleverly replacing Herbert Armstrong with himself. How else can he claim to be restoring what HWA already supposedly restored? He also claims to be doing the "Work" that HWA claimed to be finished. Pack has written a two volume autobiography now in which he brags repeatedly about how qualified he is. All he has proven to the discerning person is that he can copy and twist everything that HWA already copied and twisted. I only hope that my husband will catch the man in a lie before our marriage is over. I cannot stand by long and have us go into bankruptcy to support this liar and satanic impostor.

Thanks again for all you do. The danger is still out there. The enemy is still active. --Former member of WCG

Read: Information on Restored Church of God (David C. Pack)


Feelings of Agony, Guilt and Rejection of God Due to WCG:

April 25, 2009

I want to say thank you, thank you, thank you, for having this site! I have dealt with the agony and immense guilt for leaving the Worldwide Church of God. I was completely immersed in this church and was made to believe I was an integral part of a "family" because I was one of the "elect" of God's chosen people.

My leaving has been in degrees. I have not attended a service in over 10 years. I have carried the doctrines and the sermons in my heart. I just knew that I would be considered deceived by Satan were I to ever openly question doctrines fed to me as "truth" but which I strongly felt had many holes.

To be very honest--at the risk of suffering possible further persecution from you as I confess this--I am a gay man and knew I was gay going into WCG. But I was led to believe God Himself opened my eyes to the "truth." This "true church" was going to make me "whole" and "unperverted" and "one of God's people" and other miracles I would experience simply because I had become baptized as a member. But it was made explicitly clear that these things would come to pass only if I obeyed the doctrines in the strictest sense. I sought direction and comfort with several ministers of the church concerning my being gay, only to be told "pray about it." One minister, Mr. John Ogwyn, who personally counseled me about being gay went on to write an article for The Plain Truth magazine on homosexuality. He likened me/us to pedophiles and vehemently denounced gays as "abominations" to God. He basically said he was sickened by it and encouraged people to have no tolerance whatsoever for gay people. I took on that shame and wished I were dead. ... However, I have gained what I believe to be spiritual insight and a glimmer of hope that God has not abandoned me. Yet still, the pull of this church goes to my soul. The cycle is vicious.

I did have so many prayers answered and experienced so many blessings, but I struggle to admit that these blessings came to pass not because I was a member of this church, but rather, because I did seek God with an openly wounded heart who was willing to be as faithful of a servant as I humanly knew how to be. (I understand that the people who have formed this web site may feel the same way, and it is a chance I am willing to take in writing this. Gay people are another subject entirely.)

But my guilt and fear of rejection from God runs so deep that it has affected my health. I have sought professional therapy and have been doing so since 2003. Therapy only goes so far, since my therapist does not know the incredibly deep scars I have for leaving a church I was completely convinced was the genuinely one true church in existence directly sanctioned by Jesus Himself. I have felt such strong shame and fear for leaving, believing I defied God's Holy Spirit and chose to lose out on eternal life because (as the church would likely think), I have turned my back on God and His People and His truth. The damage runs deep with me, and I feel guilt (still) so tremendous that there are days I struggle to function.

By finding this site, perhaps I can begin to heal. Perhaps I may feel strength in finding I am not alone. If so, I have a long way to go. It is my hope that one day I can wake up and feel God is not going to punish me or ignore my prayers or throw me away or abandon me. I can believe that I really have not been deceived by Satan and lured away from "the One True Church." I can believe that I am not doomed. I want to believe I am loved.

Please tell me you understand. Please tell me I am not alone.

With warmest regards, [name removed]--Ex member in Texas

Reply: I'm glad you found our site and that it offers hope and comfort for you. Our articles help others to understand that they were deceived and exploited by an abusive, mind-manipulating organization, not a "church." You said you have a fear and rejection of God. This is part of the lies we were taught in order to keep us striving to be "obedient," and to never to leave the group. We must replace those lies with the truth. Jesus said that whosoever comes to Him He will in no wise cast out. He also says, "Come unto me all ye that labor and are heavy laden and I will give you rest." Receiving eternal life is not a matter of doing certain works in order to gain God's favor. Christ paid it all and salvation is a free gift. (See: How Can I Receive Eternal Life?)

Also see: Articles For Those Who Were Emotionally and Spiritually Abused.

Only a therapist who has an understanding of the damage religious cults inflict, or a knowledge of complex post traumatic stress disorder, will be able to understand what you have gone through. Any other counselor can end up doing further damage. Please see our Booklist. Some therapists are willing to educate themselves on these issues.

You are definitely not alone. Many from these types of groups have the same feelings. Try to remember that God loved the world (that includes you) so much that He gave His only begotten Son to die for us that we may live forever with Him. He loves you and desires the best for you.


Felt a Weight Lifted From My Shoulders:

(2nd email from person above)

April 25, 2009

I just wanted to say thank you so much for writing me back. You have made my day and probably a good chunk of my life. I feel a weight already being lifted from my shoulders because I am not alone. I have asked God to further bless you and your ministry and thanked Him for showing me your web site. It's funny, but the thought came to me today to look for support from ex-WCG members. I will sleep so much better tonight. I will probably sleep better for the rest of my life. I'd hug you if I could.
With warmest regards. --Ex member in TX


David C. Pack After Tithe Money:

April 27, 2009

Leaders in certain splinter groups know there are people hung up on there being "one true church." Someone told me that David Pack likes to draw in people who have been sitting out for a long time because he knows they've been saving their tithes. That's so sick. --Former  member of WCG and PCG


Your Site Has Explained So Much and Has Freed Me:

May 8, 2009

It's so amazing that even though people move on from the WCG and take on different ideologies, they still retain the conditioning, and it's still really all there as part of their personality! I praise the Lord Jesus Christ for entering into my life, and I'm so grateful that He led me to your site, because it has explained so much and it has freed me immensely!!! I can't overstate that enough!! 

I think I have a greater comprehension of His forgiveness and cleansing also now. So in the end it has all been a huge learning experience, and deeper understanding of God's grace! Ephesians 2:7: "That in the ages to come he might show the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus."

Our song of praise to the Lord for His wonderful grace to us through the Lord Jesus for all eternity. I don't think we'll ever get tired of it!! --Child survivor of WCG


ESN Only Website That Reaches Out So Well:

May 9, 2009

It's quite satisfying to see former WCG and offshoot members state that the ESN website has helped them so much. It is the only one I know of that reaches out so well to those who come into contact with it.

Although I don't know of a church I want to get into, I am a firm believer in Jesus, the son of God, and our Savior. I study at my own pace and keep my mind open to learning of His grace. --Florida (Former WCG member)


HWA Never Let On That Christians Go to Petra All the Time:

May 18, 2009

My children's music teacher is going to visit Petra. It's all so ironic, isn't it? I sacrificed for years in the WCG, thinking I would one day go to Petra (the "place of safety"), and now know I will never go there. And here she is, going with a church group to the place I thought I was going to be living for 3-1/2 years during the Great Tribulation. Funny how we gave all our money to HWA, all the while dreaming about making it to Petra. Had we saved our money, we could have gone at any time! HWA never let on that regular, everyday Christians go over there all the time. For some reason, I thought that Christians were never aware of Petra, that we, only, had been given permission by God to inhabit this site. I guess my ignorance was HWA's meal ticket. --Ex-WCG member


A Scripture Not Taught in WCG:

May 31, 2009

On this day of Pentecost, I would like to point out a Scripture that I cannot remember ever being taught in the WCG or the PCG (spoken by Jesus Christ):

"For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life" (John 5:22-24).

Never did we give the same honor to Jesus that we gave to the Father. Never did we believe that we would not come into condemnation, unless we jumped through the right hoops at the proper time. Jesus was only really talked about around Passover, and even then the context was mostly Old Testament. Jesus as future King was pictured as cruel and harsh. His name was spoken as the right way to end a prayer. We never prayed to Him.

The only good that I see that has come out of my many years under Armstrongism is that I now appreciate my relationship with my Lord Jesus Christ in a way that I might never have done without my years under legalism.

Praise the Son and praise the Father and praise the Holy Spirit!

--Judy McNeely (Former WCG and PCG member)

Read: What was Missing? (while written after exiting WCG, it also applies to controlling offshoots such as Restored Church of God, The Church of God-PKG, etc.)


Armstrongism is Not of God:

June 7, 2009

Thank you for your excellent website. It has helped me to understand the utter moral and doctrinal bankruptcy of Armstrongism. Thank you. You are doing a good work. Keep it up!

I have read Kelly Marshal's excellent review of Mystery of the Ages. The comments on Christianity's beliefs about the immortal soul and how HWA misunderstood it was quite fascinating. Maybe you already know this but HWA published a curious article in the November 1949 Plain Truth entitled "What is the Soul?" which exposes that HWA knew that "this world's" Christians knew of the bodily resurrection. Part of this article was also published in the April 1940 Plain Truth. [PT articles are online.] In this article he writes of two ordinary men who (supposedly) come up with the mortal man doctrine just by studying the Bible.

The two men in the article show little understanding of the bodily resurrection, but nevertheless it does show that HWA knew that Christians knew about the bodily resurrection.

The fundamental problem with this article is that he gives no acknowledgement that others knew the doctrine of the mortal soul, namely 7th-Day Adventists, Jehovah's Witnesses and others. How are we supposed to believe they came up with this idea out of a vacuum when some had long taught this doctrine long before HWA? 

Let me once again express my thanks to you for exposing the truth that Armstrongism is not of God. I really needed to hear that. --Impacted by Armstrongism [name withheld]

Comment: Read how Kelly Marshall covered this subject in the review of MOA, chapter 3, under "Man Has Mortal Soul."


Deceptions of Herbert Armstrong:

June 8, 2009

[Referring to previous letter]

It is very exciting when people come to understand the deceptions of Herbert Armstrong--that much of what he didn't say is as important (if not more important) than the things he did say. He was certainly the master of omission. He could make us believe that Christianity was completely ignorant of the Bible (and he knew how to fan the flames of suspicion and mistrust). Of course, if you read between the lines, what he was saying in actuality was, "Blame your church for your ignorance." We didn't know enough to refute him (and he knew it). HWA was a master of illusion. He could make it seem he was giving both sides of an argument, when in fact, he would omit pertinent information that could easily disprove his beliefs. It was quite an eye-opener for me when we were able to obtain the very publications he quoted from, just to discover his misrepresentations of what was actually said. And to see him do this--time after time, without any conscience--was impossible to excuse. So much was kept from us, both orthodox and unorthodox doctrines. HWA certainly didn't want us to get wise to the similarities of the doctrines of the Jehovah's Witnesses, Seventh-Day Adventists, and others that were around long before HWA received his "truth." --Kelly Marshall, author of Mystery of the Ages (a critical review) and other articles on ESN site.


Herbert Armstrong's Tangled Web Book a Real Eye-Opener

June 11, 2009

I have just finished reading the whole of Herbert Armstrong's Tangled Web by David Robinson. I thank you wholeheartedly for sending me it in the file forms. The book was a real eye-opener. It would have been wonderful had I got my hands on that book when I first became involved with WCG.

(In case anyone you have sent this book to on file mentions that they found the format difficult to read, I would say to tell the person to click on "format," then go into "columns" then click on "single column" then "okay"; that way one gets the correct layout/format. At least that worked for me.)

I found Mr. Robinson's book incredibly informative. In spite of what he suffered at the hands of spiritual abusers, I did not find his comments at all bitter. I found them to be overwhelmingly objective. No mean feat itself, as anyone knows who has been an exiter of WCG, or any of its offshoots. It is difficult to be objective about any kind of manipulator, tormentor or bully--even if their behaviour has been aimed at another and not at us personally. As Mr. Robinson was the victim of manipulation and spiritual abuse personally, his objectivity is all the more admirable. This is bearing in mind that bullies of any kind themselves are the most subjective of people as were those who laboured to hurt David Robinson. 

My wife and I--indeed almost if not all our friends who had been members of WCG--had come into personal contact with people like Gerald Waterhouse and HWA. We had contact with people like Stanley Rader if only by satellite telecasting and his writings. Actually, I hadn't long joined WCG when I first heard Rader speak and I was impressed with him as I was impressed with his book, Against the Gates of Hell. I can remember him saying in a Feast of Tabernacles telecast, that he did not love his enemies. "I do not hate them," he went on to say, "but I do not love them." He was referring to those who denigrated him. I can also remember him saying how much he loved Herbert Armstrong and, as we say in Scotland, "bummed him up" (meaning, "praised him to the skies").
 
It was either during my first Feast of Tabernacle attendance or my second that we had all been given a free copy of Against the Gates of Hell. As I was a young aspiring writer at the time, I rather enjoyed the book. It appealed to my own intellectual leanings at that time. It would all have been a different story had I also been given a copy of David Robinson's book!
 
Over here in Britain, we were kept ignorant of those things that were tearing WCG apart. People I knew who had worked in the printing at Bricket Wood, prior to returning to Scotland, told me of behaviour there that shocked me. I was told that there were plenty of people who worked in the printing who weren't converted--converted meaning members of WCG; that was one and the same thing in my neophyte frame of mind. I wondered why they were allowed to work there. But as we were reading so much in WCG publications, fed to us from the United States, stating that HWA had things back on the track, I wasn't too bothered. I can even remember a picture of HWA inside a cartoon of a train engine, I think wearing a driver's hat (drawn in), with a caption showing how he had the church back on the track.
 
Actually, a thing I hadn't noticed until the "changes" in WCG was how all members used the term "church" to refer only to WCG and no other. Soon after the changes, when we were allowed to think more for ourselves, I personally started to use the term "Worldwide" when referring to WCG, to make clear that I no longer saw it as God's only church. But old habits die hard and I often slipped into the term "church." I notice Worldwiders still use the term "church" applying to themselves alone. Even some exiters still do--force of habit!
 
I can remember Gerald Waterhouse. I was afraid of some of the thoughts I used to have about him. I thought I was being critical of a messenger of God. This was in spite of how just prior to or during the "changes" it struck me that there are only two kinds of criticism--viz., false (therefore unfair) and true (therefore fair) criticism. If Waterhouse or Herbert Armstrong were above criticism, I realized, it meant that they were infallible. If they were infallible, then they were on a par with God which I knew to be ridiculous in the extreme.

Thank you again. Your work is a blessing.

--Former WCG member in Britain [name withheld]


Abuses Suffered in United Church of God:

June 30, 2009

My sisters and I were the third generation in our family, on both sides, to attend WCG, so the control goes way back. Ministers at Worldwide prevented my grandparents from seeking medical treatment of their newborn baby in the 1960's, and an uncle on my father's side had been prevented from seeing us because he felt the WCG was at fault for the baby's death.

After the WCG changes, my family joined United Church of God. But when I was about five, my father stopped going to services, staying home with my little sister instead. The ministers blamed my mother for his absence. Later when they divorced, it was again her fault that she couldn't keep him. With no husband, my mother could no longer be the stay-at-home mom that she once was. The UCG ministers oversaw every job application she sent in. At times they even prevented her from having well-paying jobs. Finally, she found a job at a hospital under multiple bosses who also attended UCG. Her job made any piece work conversation public knowledge at services. The small amount of money she gained from her job mostly went for tithing. I remember nights where a single box of macaroni and cheese was dinner for four.

Around this time, I broke my back in an accident that UCG claimed was my fault. The ministers suggested that I did not need medical help--not even the back brace. For two months they pestered me daily to be anointed, but offered little information as to what that entailed. After bringing me to tears one day, my mother finally told them to leave and that I did not require their services. With this final statement, ministers and brethren alike gave us the cold-shoulder when we went to services. I fully believe that God intervened at this time to bring us out of there. Various car and health problems prevented our departure on Saturdays. When we finally left UCG, family members--including both sets of grand parents--had to sneak around the UCG to see us. Mother lost her job at the hospital, but finally got one elsewhere.

I still believe in God, but since have come enjoy His actual teachings.
 
Thank you, --Child survivor
 

Living Hope Ministries Still Practice and Hold on to Cult-like Ideas:

July 2, 2009

A few years ago I met this guy at my church. Come to find out he learned that I was once in a cult called the Worldwide Church of God, and they were trying to whitewash themselves to mainstream Christianity, to make themselves more palatable. I was telling him one way is by putting out this video, Called To Be Free, by Living Hope Ministries. My new friend Jim piped up, "Not Living Hope Ministries?" I asked Jim, "Why did you say it like that!" Jim went on to tell me that he was a reverend of a small Christian church in Utah before he moved to Florida. He said that Living Hope Ministry approached him to buy his church property and take over his congregation. He refused and finally found a true Christian pastor to take over the congregation. I asked Jim why he did not sell to Living Hope. Jim informed me that the leaders of Living Hope left the Mormon church but they still practice some cult-like ideas and still hold on to a few Mormon ideas. So the way I see it is , you have one misguided group producing a movie for another misguided group trying to brainwash the world that everything is fine. How messed up is that? --A. W.


Christian Rock Band Rescinds and Says They Do Not Recommend WCG:

August 24, 2009

I wanted to let you know about something exciting. The leader (I will call him "R") of a contemporary Christian band [name removed] had written a nice article about the WCG and their video Called to be Free. My teenage son saw this and emailed "R" and explained why he felt that the WCG was not as repentant as they appeared to be (he also went over many of your articles on WCG). After much correspondence with him, "R" also asked a counter-cult apologetic expert [name removed]. This apologetic expert gave "R" a detailed response with problem areas the organization still needs to work on and told him that a fair amount of false teaching still exists fairly unchecked, especially at the local level, and we should not send new believers to the church. "R" has rescinded his recommendations about the WCG and now states that his band is "not recommending the Worldwide Church of God as a good church to attend at this time." I am so relieved. I am going to write to "R" and thank him for investigating this and being open-minded. I've met the guy five times (my kids love his concerts), and he's really nice. In fact, my kids were saved at his concerts. I had told my son that all we could do was provide the information and pray that the Lord lead him in the right direction. I'm so grateful He did! --Exiter of WCG [name removed]

Update: Read letter below: Met Christian Rock Band Leader that Rescinded on WCG


Members Do Not Resist What WCG Headquarters Tells Them:

August 25, 2009

I still think it's amazing that the mainstream Christians believe that Tkach & Co. are trying to "change the church" but that they lay members are resisting. Joseph W. Tkach Jr. had over 10 years to make the appropriate changes, and yet we still see the HQ's personnel still not coming clean with HWA! JWT Jr. has always been in charge. Isn't it his "Christian duty" to see to it that the lay members have adequate and accurate information about HWA? How can this be the lay members fault?

I've seen Neal Earle's online articles and about his calling HWA a "Christian CEO" and a "defender of orthodoxy." [Note: Read ESN article: Neil Earle Whitewashes Herbert Armstrong] This doesn't even begin to mention Mike Feazell's avoidance of heaven and hell and basically holding the members to the belief of Universalism. These are not the lay members writing this stuff! They will only believe what they are told to believe! If JWT Jr. told them the moon was made out of green cheese, they would believe it. Members do not resist HQ's as Herbert Armstrong taught us to never rebel or question the government "no matter how wrong they are." I followed this belief clear to the end. But at least there are still discerning Christian ministries that can see how the WCG has sat on the fence for over a decade. Hank Hanegraaff is another person of very "questionable character." --Former member of WCG


David Pack's Autobiography Shows an Egomaniac:

August 29, 2009

I have had a look at Pack's Autobiography Vol. 1. ("The Authorized Biography of David C. Pack") From the size of it, including the considerable amount of pictures of himself and his achievements, he is trying to outdo HWA in that as well. It is a huge book, at least as big as a Bible, and that is just Vol. 1! The sheer size of it shows what an egomaniac he is. Pack (who is 61 years old this year) begins with lengthy details of his family and how they came to America very early in its history. It is like he is trying to prove some kind of royal bloodline. He also tries to prove that he was picked out by God for some kind of greatness. He makes a big point of how young he was when "called" (17) and how many years of "intensive" training he had. The impression is that he is even better prepared than HWA was. The Preface points out that Pack was "personally trained by Mr. Armstrong during the last 15 years of his life" and because of this "unusual training" and "unique training" God was able to use him to restore HWA's doctrines ("God's final Work"). I noticed how many times he liked to use the word, extraordinary; i. e.:  "extraordinary life," "extraordinary insight," "extraordinary worldwide ministry," "extraordinary setback," "training of an extraordinary nature," "chosen for extraordinary and difficult responsibility," "extraordinary blessing," "extraordinary knowledge," etc. It is supposed to have taken him several years to decide to write this autobiography because "he did not want to focus on himself." Vol. 1 ends in the 1990's after filling a mind-boggling 608 pages! --Impacted by Armstrongism


Found Your Site Incredibly Helpful:

September 7, 2009

Hello,

I have found your website to be incredibly helpful. It was helpful in my escape from Armstrongism a year ago. Thank you very much for providing all the great information. --X-HWA


WCG Guilty of Sensitivity Training:

September 8, 2009

I believe the WCG is guilty of sensitivity training, especially when they made their new changes. Below is an excerpt from "Sensitivity Training - New Age Psychology in the Church" by M. H. Reynolds:

"How to Spot Sensitivity Training Sessions: ... The following methods are given only because they are perhaps the most frequently used and readily observable procedures:

 

  1. One or more people in the group, known technically as trainers, or change

  agents, or facilitators, will give the impression that they are merely

  stimulating free expression or openness, but will actually by manipulating the

  group, without their knowledge, if possible.

 

  2. Most sensitivity training sessions stress agreement upon certain ground

  rules, which actually become the first foundation of sensitivity training,

  since individuals hesitate to break rules which they themselves agreed to at

  the outset. Such rules may simply be agreeing to stay until the session is

  ended; agreeing to be open and honest in all conversations; agreeing not to

  talk during non-verbal exercises; and in some cases, the rules go so far as to

  agree not to object to language normally thought objectionable in the group.

 

  3. You will probably be asked to speak of or write out your greatest problems

  or faults or hang-ups so the group can make suggestions as to how you can

  overcome these things. You, in turn, may be encouraged to criticize others in

  the group if you feel they are not fully open or honest in confessing their

  faults.

 

  4. Non-verbal exercises may be used where individuals are asked to convey

  their feelings by some means other than words. This may involve the use of the

  eyes, facial expression, or body movement, including touching each other's

  hands, faces, or bodies in an effort to communicate feeling.

 

  5. Periods of silence and meditation with eyes either closed or open are

  frequently used when the discussions seem to be developing in the wrong way or

  when the trainer desires to make an abrupt change in the procedures.

 

  6. Marathon sessions are frequently used to break down "inhibitions" and

  encourage participants to express "their true feelings" under the stress of

  physical fatigue and lack of sleep.

 

The history of sensitivity training in the churches: The National Council of Churches has been deeply involved in sensitivity training programs almost from the very beginning. ... The World Council of Churches is also deeply involved in, and has been a showcase for, sensitivity training. ... Many liberal religious leaders have become experts in the field of sensitivity training, and are busily engaged in training others to become change agents in the church and in society."

 

--Exiter
 

Comment: Also read letter: WCG Getting Others to Buy Into the Changes. "Change-agent for Christ" is another term that has been used and is New Age terminology.
 



David C. Pack Plans to Be on History Channel:

 

September 9, 2009

Tonight the History Channel is showing a program called "The Nostradamus Effect." The show will be the first of several episodes. They will be comparing views of end time prophecies from many cultures and sources including the modern Bible interpretations. Each episode will be shown several times.

The episode with David Pack will be shown sometime in mid October. [Update: Pack was interviewed on November 11. See letters below.] He sent out an email to the membership about it. He is already trying to lower expectations in the members. He realizes that he will probably not be shown in the best light, and that his opinion will be just one of many right along with pagan beliefs. He could not resist, however, having the opportunity to be seen as an "expert" by millions of viewers in the world. He admits that Herbert Armstrong would probably not have done such an interview, but justifies his participation by saying that there was no such thing as the History Channel back then.

In my opinion, his huge ego could not resist the chance of being seen as a "Prophecy Expert." He brags about all the time he used to spend personally discussing prophecy with HWA. I really doubt that, since he was so young and unimportant. HWA made so many false prophecies, that it is impossible to keep track of them all. To say that "his timing was just off" is ridiculous. I really doubt that the "End Time Elijah," or the "End Time Apostle" would be allowed by God to mislead anybody.

One last observation: Pack really revels in the fact that it is himself and not Gerald Flurry doing this interview. He says that Flurry turned it down, which is hard to believe unless he has learned how easy it is to be "burned" in an interview. I know that Pack is hoping that this will be his opportunity to pull members away from the PCG. He and Flurry are bitter enemies at this point, and name calling is done quite often by both of them. --Affected by RCG


Dave Pack Now Saying He is the Joshua of Zechariah 3:

September 24, 2009

This [interview with Pack on the History Channel] will probably be made available on his web site. He looks for any reason to toot his own horn.

He is now teaching that he is the Joshua of Zech 3. He is sounding more like Gerald Flurry and less like Christ. --Former member of RCG


Spared From Living Church of God After Finding ESN Site:

September 28, 2009

My husband first wrote an e-mail to LCG, asking if they had a church in our town, and when and where it was so we could join them in a worship service. He was then asked to sign up for a Bible study through using a link online. He agreed, asking again where they met.

It was not until about a month or two later that he learned where they met. After one visit to the Living Church of God, my husband was super excited. He shared some of their beliefs with me and it looked like our lives were heading down a path I was absolutely not interested in going.

I believe this group preyed on his love of the Lord, and did not give him all of the facts upfront. So after a sense of total fear, I got on the internet and immediately found your site. I was able to produce enough documentation to show him that he is determined to not go back.

For this, I cannot thank you all enough. Every letter writer, every one who shared their experiences, every one who gave information on mind control: Bless you!

Not only is he not joining, he is never going back!! PRAISE GOD! I also called the [name removed] where they were meeting and gave them your website, just so they would be aware of who this group was.

He was not told where they were meeting until after he completed this Bible study online. That was the first sign. Also, he was told that others might have a problem with this religion because "God would harden their hearts." It was like they were readying him for the reaction he was sure to get from the world around him. Also, he mentioned to me some responses he got when talking to these people, and it sounded scripted, like they were taught how to answer such questions.

I just can't believe all the hate, all the pointing to what's wrong with everything, all of the making people question everything.

So glad it's over. Whew!

Sincerely, --A fortunate non member of LCG, never going to be one


LCG Services Were Held in Funeral Home:

September 29, 2009

We attended services at the LCG once. I didn't like it, and I don't think my husband did either. There was something "dark" and "foreboding" about it. If that wasn't bad enough, services were held in a funeral home. --Not a member


LCG and WCG Are Predator Churches:

September 30, 2009

I just want to make a comment about the previous letter you received [9-29-09] from one of your viewers. I'm glad to read that she and her husband only attended one LCG service and did not get involved with them. Although I was never part of the LCG or Worldwide, I've known people who got caught up in that mess and had their lives and finances ruined by them. I've read horror stories on yours, and other sites, about these predator churches.

I would also like to say that I was quite surprised to read where that one particular LCG congregation held services. At a funeral home! WOW! That is weird, strange, twisted, and quite morbid. I've heard of some strange places where various churches of God holds services, but this takes the prize and drops to a new all time low. But I guess a funeral home would be an appropriate place to hold services seeing the LCG is a dead church anyway. I'm guessing no one ever told the LCG that Jesus is the God of the living, not the dead, and that a funeral home is no place for church services to be held.

As for this couple, I hope they just stick to the Bible and they'll find Jesus and salvation through the word of God. As one of the disciples said, Jesus, "has the words of eternal life." (John 6:68) I hope they also find themselves a good Christ centered bible based church. God Bless! --C. J.


Those Who Have Been Caught Up in the Churches of God Movement:

October 4, 2009

Hello,

For the past few months I've logged on to ESN to read the stories of people who got caught up in the whole churches of God movement. While many of these stories are very sad and depressing, I also think they speak of a sense of victory as well because these people were brave enough to stand up against the lies and deceptions that were dished out to them by the Armstrong's and the other false teachers and their cultist organizations. Even though many of these people have been kicked, beaten and bruised by these bully churches, Jesus has given them the strength to get back on their feet and shake off the shackles of Armstrongism and embrace our Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ our Savior. Our Precious Lord has led these people out of the hell of the churches of God and brought them into His presence to give them real peace and understanding, to offer His unconditional love, grace and mercies which endures forever. I've also noticed while reading through your letters that many people searching for the "true church" have rejected the churches of God, and have saved themselves, physically, mentally, financially and spiritually after reading how these churches control and manipulate their members.

Some of these offshoot organizations of the Worldwide Church of God, I'm sorry, I stand corrected, the "Phony Church of God" are very dangerous, and the leaders of these groups are roaring lions devouring the people who are looking to find the Lord. They prey upon these poor people, especially the most vulnerable, namely the children and the elderly. I feel sorry for the children born into these groups because they will go through a life of hell especially when they start school. They will have few or no friends, they will be mocked and made fun of. These poor children will go through life rejected by their peers, they will have low self esteem, and be lonely and depressed. That is no way for a child to grow up--in other words, they will be stripped of their childhood. This is a crime. I also feel bad for the elderly in these groups. Many of these people won't leave because groups like the PCG, LCG, RCG and so on have these poor folks living in such fear they think that if they leave that they will end up in the lake of fire. As long as these phony churches can keep the fear going, it gives them a guaranteed income. The worst part is once these old folks die off, these churches will continue to instill the fear into and to prey on the children, so when they become adults they can continue to fleece the next generation of the flock.

To my understanding many of these churches are losing members. The older ones are dying off and some of the younger ones are getting wise to the whole scam and are leaving. It seems these churches are getting desperate for new blood but very few are answering the call. Thank God for sites like ESN. I guess ol' Herbie Armstrong never dreamed of a day when someone from the comfort of their home would be able to do some research on his pathetic organization and then reject his evil little works by typing in his name on a computer and clicking a mouse. Too bad the internet didn't exist in the 50's. Herbert Armstrong's "church" would not have expanded, and it could have died off back then, saving thousands of people from the grief and misery that he and the current leaders put them through. So perhaps the internet and sites like ESN will be the final nail in the coffins of the churches of God? I also hope that people looking for Christ stay away from these so-called churches, and current members find the real Jesus through prayer and Bible study and get out and develop a right and healthy relationship with our Lord without fear and intimidation.

Thank you ESN for your great work and may Jesus Christ our Lord and real Savior and our Heavenly Father bless you. --T. C.


Church of God International Teachings Did Not Add Up:

October 4, 2009

I got caught up in the Church of God International around 1999. I knew very little about them or their founder Garner Ted Armstrong. GTA had been fired by CGI by the time I joined, but they still offered his books and sermon tapes for a short time after he left. I was around 28 nor 29 years old when I joined and I only had a basic understanding of the Bible so it was easy for me to fall for some of this false doctrine of the so called "true church" and the holy days.

I would take time off of work without pay to attend these events, spend my hard earned cash on the Feast of Tabernacles with nothing to show for but an empty wallet and a credit card bill. As for the Sabbath, because I was required to stop work at sundown Friday nights I had to ask my employer for that time and the problem was because I worked steady afternoon shifts and they would not accommodate me, so instead they put me on the midnight shift. So that was four months of hell, because it is not natural to be up all night. After four months, regardless of the Sabbath, I had to return to the afternoon shift, so I could sleep at night again and regain my sanity and physical health.

From the beginning I knew something was wrong with many of their teachings. As I already said, I didn't know enough of the Bible at that time, but perhaps I knew more than what I thought because some things they were teaching just did not add up, and I guess it was by the grace of Jesus Christ that I started to catch on almost immediately. They taught the "three resurrections," British Israelism, and they used a statement Jesus made in John 10:34 to "prove" we will be "gods." None of these are biblical at all. As for the "gods" bit, according to my New King James Study Bible it was in reference to being judges. And when you look in the Psalms where Jesus quoted that from, that particular passage is referring to judging and being judges, not to becoming God. After all, God says He knows of no other gods, and he will not give his glory to anyone.

I read at that time GTA's book The Real Jesus. After reading the book I threw it out, as it was nothing but pure speculation by Ted Armstrong about how Jesus might have lived while He was on the earth. He claimed Jesus "might have had red hair, owned at least two homes, was a business man, did healings before He even started His ministry, and his parent hired private tutors to educate him." That's strange because the Bible states that people were surprised that Jesus could read "never having studied letters." The Bible never said what Jesus in His human form looked like, and His turning water into wine was His first miracle. So much for the credibility of GTA. Once again the Bible proves him to be a liar. It should come as no surprise since Herbert Armstrong, GTA's father, wrote a lot of trash as well. I read HWA's Mystery of the Ages. I had to throw that out after reading up to the chapter about angels. Like father like son. I feel sorry for the many trees that had to lay down their lives to be turned into pulp and paper to have this Armstrong dribble written upon. --Impacted by Armstrongism


We Had to Call Ministers "Mister."

October 9, 2009

I was reminded of something that I came to realize after leaving the PCG. It had to do with their absolute requirement to address all ministers as "Mister." This is such a strong requirement that I would actually say it's a doctrine, or at least close to a doctrine. The WCG and all of the offshoots that I know of require calling a Minister named John Smith "Mr. Smith," or "Mr. John Smith," as an example.
 
Now interestingly, if you look up the word "Mister" in just about any dictionary you'll see that the derivative of the word is "Master." Now there's nothing wrong with addressing a gentleman with "Mister" before his name out of respect, but for a church to require this address or title is a different story. --Former member of WCG and PCG 

Comment: In some ways, members are admitting inferiority to these ministers if they call them "Mister." Many mainstream Christians prefer the word "brother" instead.

 

Calling Ministers Mister:

October 9, 2009

I just wanted add a comment about the previous letter on calling ministers Mister.

No minister or member in any of the churches ever addressed or called God, or Jesus Christ, as Mr. God, or Mr. Jesus, or Mr. Christ, or even Master Jesus, or Master Christ, yet they desired respect, and required for members to address them with the title Mr., a derivative of Master.

Also Christ admonished the multitudes along with his disciples never to call any man Master, which as stated the salutation of Mr., Rabbi, teacher, and also leader can be a derivative of Master.

In Matt 23:7-11:

7. And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
8. But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ, and all ye are brethren.
9. And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your father, which is in heaven.
10. Neither be ye called Masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
11. But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.

It appears to me the sheep of the congregation have always been the servants of the ministry. Just my two cents. --Joe


One Set of Rules For Leaders; Another for Members:

October 9, 2009

I personally knew of people who were currently in the military, and came into the WCG, and then filed for "conscientious objector" status to be discharged from the military. But I will add this, as I know it to be true. If you were somebody in the WCG with money or status, you were the exception to the rule! So the WCG was very hypocritical about this (and I don't think the UCG is really any better). For instance, if you were a doctor, lawyer, chiropractor, etc. that had come into contact with the WCG, and you made lots of $$$$, then really, nothing was said of you. Most of these people were "self-employed" and did not have to work on the Sabbath and they never had to put their jobs on the line. I know for certain, those who had money, if they ever had to work on the Sabbath (for whatever rare occasion it may be), it was always excused as "an ox in a ditch" situation. The WCG knew they weren't going to penalize the rich, as they knew where their income was coming from. These men had status in the church, and of course, were in good with the ministers. These types can pretty much do anything they want and never get in trouble because their actions would always fall under some kind of protection clause that made it seem they were being holy. But for the average member, they had a different set of rules to follow. If the average member wanted to go to college to be a doctor, lawyer, etc., he was certainly discouraged! In cults there are one set of rules for the members, and another for the leaders. --R. M.


Calling Ministers "Mister" Much More than a Token of Respect:

October 10, 2009

I have come to realize that the required practice of calling the ministers, "Mister," is much more than just a token of respect. The ministers on their part feel perfectly free to call all the members by their first names, with the exception of the short time the men spend in Spokesman Club ( which is a joke and another subject). The result of this familiar name calling is to demean all of the members to the level of little children. In fact, we had to be willing to obey any command given without question, much as we were supposed to teach the same to our children. Nothing had to be explained. No minister was to be questioned as to reason or motive. The old saying is familiar to every ex-member: "If a minister tells you to jump, on the way up you ask, 'How high?''"
 
There was one other exception to the rule of the ministry using first names. They might, at their discretion, call an aged member by Mr. or Mrs. I have never known an old member, though, that wasn't absolutely terrified of displeasing the minister. They usually live in terror of being put out and losing their salvation. I cannot remember a very old member who was not living at or below the poverty level and at the mercy of whatever help they might receive from the local minister. This is a pitiful abuse of the very old.
I hope the day soon comes when all of these wolves and "angels of light" are seen for what they really are: parasites with delusions of grandeur. --Ex member of WCG/PCG and affected by RCG

Comment: It is true that cults reduce their members to children. It served to keep us humble and obedient to the "government," but we also didn't mature.


Deacons to be Called Mister:

October 11, 2009

Not only are ministers to be called "Mister" but also deacons. This is a fact in the PCG. I am not sure about the other splinter groups.

I am an ex member of WCG and have a relative in PCG. This person has known a newly appointed deacon for many years and now has to address him and his wife as Mr. and Mrs. I am told this a term of respect for the office now held by the deacon.
If for some reason a deacon no longer holds that office, then they may be called again by their first name. ---Ex WCG & Impacted by PCG.


UCG Minister at Feast Implies Members Should Give All:

October 13, 2009

I was surprised at what I heard in the Last Great Day Sermon when I attended the feast in Wisconsin Dells. It was given by Michael Hanisko (UCG minister) and called: "The Duty is Ours, the Results are God's."

Toward the end of sermon (which had this theme to "stay the course," "our duty," "give up your fortune for a higher cause"), it gave a reference to Robert Morris (one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence) and he said that Morris gave up his entire fortune to the cause (implying folks in the UCG should do this).

The sermon said that Robert Morris had to leave his sick wife and children to escape the debt he was in. When he returned from prison, according to the sermon, he had found that his wife was dead and his children were entirely missing, never to found as they were given to others to raise. He lived in poverty for the rest of his life. But as the sermon goes, he gave it all up for a higher cause.

I researched Robert Morris on Wikipedia, and what was said in the sermon is not true about Robert Morris's life story. Yes, he did give up money (over $10,000) to help George Washington and many others during the Revolutionary war, but he lived many years after 1776 working for our country and helping our country gain its first bank, etc., and his wife was wealthy. But Morris lost his "fortune" many years after the war in bad land investments, which had nothing to do with giving it up for the cause, and he did not give up his entire fortune! His wife was able to help him, as well as Washington himself. Morris was sent to Debtor's Prison by somebody to whom he owed money from these failed investments. Although he never regained his wealth, his wife took care of him after his discharge from prison. She was alive when he was released from prison, and she took care of him for the rest of his years. If she was alive, then I will safely assume that his children weren't lost! 

And what Morris gave to the war effort was really nothing compared to what Haym Salomon gave. Salomon gave over $200,000 (which is $3.5 million in today's dollars). Since my figures for Salomon are true, then Hanisko is wrong in stating that Morris gave around $2 million dollars, which conflicts with the amount that Wikipedia stated, even in today's dollars. Quite an exaggeration! Morris himself said he broke even with all the merchant ships he gained and lost during the war.

It was Haym Salomon that died virtually penniless, not Robert Morris. And Salomon was not sent to debtor's prison as Morris was. Salomon held over $353,000 in worthless Continental currency and certificates. He and Morris worked together to keep the USA financially afloat during the War. I wonder why Hanisko never said anything about Salomon (a Jew)?  Maybe because he wasn't a "signer of the Declaration of Independence." He was acknowledged by the U.S. Postal system as the "financial hero of the American Revolution." There is no way Hanisko could have just "mixed up Morris and Salomon." That in itself would show more poor research.

Throughout the whole sermon, Hanisko kept emphasizing "deep responsibility to future generations." He said these men "pledged their lives, their fortunes, their sacred honor" and didn't shrink back when the chips were down. He said that Morris spent three years in Debtor's Prison, and didn't have money to buy his own home, his own clothes or his own food, but "never complained" and that he was never repaid.

This sermon not only didn't tell the whole truth, but it used our Founding Fathers' sacrifices to make folks in UCG feel "Patriotic" when giving and sacrificing.
 
It amazes me how much an organization (United Church of God) will go to deceive others out of "their fortunes," and how much a minister will allow those in the audience to feel that their fortune (the small savings they have, house, small families) must be entirely given up, even to go into debt (as this minister spoke of Robert Morris), even prison (because of not being able to repay debt) for "the cause"!

Most folks in UCG never look up the information or books and articles referred to in sermons, or even take notes for that matter.

It is a shame what an organization can do to so many people and for the most part get away with it! --In UCG in Wisconsin (but planning on exiting)

Comment: The whole point of this letter was to show how UCG is coercing its members into giving (the same as WCG did). This was especially done to members on the Last Great Day before the final offering was taken up. It also shows how members don't usually do their own research but just take their minister's word for it.
 


UCG's Agenda to Line Their Pockets With Money:

October 14, 2009

This UCG minister who spoke at the Dells cannot plead "confusing Salomon with Morris" because in his sermon he was speaking about the men that signed the Declaration of Independence and Salomon didn't sign it. Yes, these men sacrificed for a noble cause, but that was the history behind the founding of our country. It cannot be compared to the UCG's agenda for lining their pockets with members' money. --Anonymous


Met Christian Rock Band Leader That Rescinded on WCG:

November 11, 2009

I wrote you on August 24 about "R", the leader of a contemporary Christian band [name removed] that rescinded on WCG after my teenage son emailed him. [See letter above: Christian Rock Band Rescinds and Says They Do Not Recommend WCG]

Well, I wanted to tell you how we just attended one of "R's" concerts and I was able to talk with him in person. We had a nice conversation. He certainly agreed with me that HWA was the worst heretic to walk this earth since Joseph Smith! I told him that the WCG members will admit that they do not know where "HWA went" after his death. I told him that the WCG member that my son was later emailing said, "HWA was a man" (which, of course, led to our agreement that he was not simply a man, but a heretic). I told "R" that it was the duty of the WCG leadership [when they made their changes] to ensure that the members understood who and what HWA truly was. He wholeheartedly agreed. He said that he had gotten emails from other WCG members saying that their congregations were reformed. He said that his pulling out his endorsement of the "Called to be Free" video led to quite a firestorm, but he seemed to feel he made the right decision. I told him that my mate and I would have stayed in to help with the WCG reforms, but we noticed their refusal to come clean about HWA. I told him how disturbing it was when members were told that "God was revealing new light' and we were being given "new truth" instead of admitting that the "new truth" was mainstream Christianity all along! I told him that Evangelicals make the mistake of thinking that the true gospel (turning from your sins and asking Jesus into your heart and accepting Him as your personal Savior) had been preached to the members and that they repented and accepted Jesus during that
disastrous Joseph W. Tkach Sr. sermon in January 1995 (which was full of cognitive dissonance). No. Tkach Sr. announced the new doctrines and we were to simply accept them. He could have told us that little green men lived on the moon, show a few scriptures, say that HWA would endorse their changes, and the members would simply accept it. There was no "repentance", but only "acceptance" of the new party line. I remember them telling us that "If HWA were alive, he would wholeheartedly accept the changes because he would OBEY THE GOVERNMENT." I am certain that members today have more freedom than they did (in spite of still being  mind-controlled). But it is proven that cults "re-invent themselves" when a new leadership takes over. --Exiter of WCG [name removed]

Comment: To understand the real reasons behind the WCG changes go to our section: Research Info on Worldwide Church of God.


David C. Pack Does Not Make Strong Impression on the History Channel:

November 11, 2009

After viewing the latest episode of "The Nostradamus Effect" on the History Channel, I felt almost cheated. David Pack was indeed on, but he was only one of about five "experts." All the others had titles with their names, but under his picture it just said David Pack, Restored Church of God. Was he hiding the fact that he claims to be an apostle? About half of the time he was allowed to appear, they didn't even put up his name.

He was given several snippets of about one to two sentences each. The other experts were given much more time to make their points. He finally had maybe one minute toward the end of the program, but it was very unmemorable. I think it was just a statement about how the army of Satan would be killed in the final battle. By then, I was so bored by the speculations and the goofy representations of Satan, the False Prophet, and the Anti-Christ, that I hardly remember what he said. He certainly didn't make a strong impression. I think his members must be disappointed after all the hype.

I did have one reaction to the program. I couldn't help but see a resemblance between the False Prophet and Gerald Flurry. Ha! I am sure it was not intentional, but there it was. --Former member of PCG; impacted by RCG


Dave Pack's Contribution on the History Channel Was Minimal:

November 13, 2009

I watched the History Channel on Nov. 11. Pack had two very short appearances. He said demonic possession is real, and then they talked about how we should expect to see the arrival of two monsters brought here by Satan to lead people to Satan.

Dave Pack had such a small part in the program that his contribution to it was minimal and uninspiring. He didn't appear to me to be particularly knowledgeable or charismatic. --Impacted by loved ones in PCG


David Pack Makes Bland Addition on History Channel:

November 13, 2009

I saw David Pack on the show and thought he made a rather bland addition to the so-called "experts" on a rather bland episode of a tired series. I think the whole series could have been wrapped up after two, maybe three, episodes. They are now just a rehash of the same material week after week and are, along with the whole 2012 genre, becoming quite stale.

I laughed outloud when I read the letter from Nov. 11 mentioning a resemblance of the False Prophet to Flurry. I am sure that it was only coincidental though, since Flurry, really, in the grand scheme of things, will be less than even a footnote in history. --Vaughn Woodfield, exiter of PCG


Dave Pack Had No Real Content on History Channel:

November 13, 2009

Dave Pack was innocuous, totally a non-event. He sounded authoritarian and looked the part in his dark suit with white shirt and red tie. They probably used his statements 5 or 6 times, but they were brief one or two sentence statement edits. He had no real content. And nothing he said was contradictory to what any of the others' views on the program might have been. If he makes anything large of this to his followers, it will be his own personal inflation and a total falsehood. --Exiter; impacted by PCG


False Prophet on the History Channel Looked Like Flurry:

(2nd email from person who wrote November 11 letter above)

November 14, 2009

The False Prophet they portrayed on the Nostradamus series was the one from Revelation, and they showed a man who looked a lot like Flurry. They even showed him calling down fire. Anybody that saw the show and knows what Flurry looks like will understand what I meant. --Exiter of PCG; impacted by RCG


Do You Have Info on House of Yahweh?

November 17, 2009

I saw your article on religious addiction. Do you have info on the House of Yahweh? Apparently there are some former WCG members there.

My dad emails me periodically with how I better ship out and join his House of Yahweh group or I'm doomed, and then he quotes scriptures about how people despised the prophets, mocked the truth etc. The members seem to be proud of the persecution they are receiving from the media. --Inquirer

Comment: See 2001 letter to ESN: House of Yahweh a Dangerous Cult and our updated comments about this group.


Collection Taken on Holy Days Isn't Biblical:

December 1, 2009

A point that helped me from ever coming into WCG was made in a tract by Church of God (7th Day) that I read back around 1970. That point I've never forgot. That collection they took up on their Holy Days isn't Biblical. I looked into the meaning of the phase "Offering made by fire." There's over 60 references to it to get a grasp of its meaning. In English it is oblivious, even more so in Hebrew. Leviticus 23 "offering by fire" are sacrifices, not done on the 1st and last day, but on all 7-8 days of Unleavened Bread and Feast of Tabernacles. The offerings were public, not private offerings.

Blue Letter Bible has a web site available to anyone with net connection:

http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H801&t=KJV

H801: burnt-offering, offering made by fire, fire offering.

Note what it takes to make an offering by fire: A Levite Priest was to administer it, and it was an altar with a fire in it.

This was something very different from what HWA instituted. HWA collected the money and spent it where he wished. --J. G.


Restored Church of God is Beginning to Tighten Control:

December 21, 2009

While I have no idea how many members are in the Restored Church of God (RCG), I do know they are picking up numbers from those leaving the PCG as well as new people who learned of them from ads or on the internet.

As the numbers grow, the control is tightening down. Also, people who are new are under inspection by the local deacon or elder. They can be sure that a report will be made to the minister about their personal appearance, as well as their conduct and attitude. From the very first, they will be under scrutiny to be sure they do not have a "government problem."

No matter what David Pack may say, he is not a "kinder, gentler" leader. He may speak smoothly at first, but he will not allow anyone to have a personal opinion. Like nearly all other splinters, the RCG considers itself the "only true church" and reverences HWA while at the same time cleverly "updates" his teaching and prophecies.

No matter what any of these splinters say, if HWA had been the End Time Elijah, nothing he said would have to be corrected or updated in any way. How long are people willing to wait after this man died before they have to admit that he could not possibly have been the Elijah? --Impacted by RCG


HWA Twisted Members' Minds About Christmas:

December 21, 2009

For the past couple of Sundays, I've been listening to the 4th grade Sunday School teacher telling the kids about Christmas (I'm a helper). She explained the whole Christmas story surrounding the birth of Jesus using the beautiful pictures used as part of the Sunday school curriculum. Then she showed a picture of the wise men giving gifts to Jesus as a young child. She distinctly pointed out in the picture that Jesus was a toddler, and not a baby, and how Mary and Joseph were living in a house. She clearly explained to them that Scripture showed that Jesus had to be around two years old at the time the wise men arrived. I remember how HWA used to make this a point of contention. I remember being told in the WCG how inaccurate the nativity scene was, which only "proved" how right HWA was. Now I see how HWA totally twisted his members' minds concerning Christmas. The manger scene with Mary, Joseph, Jesus, the shepherds and wise men are lumped together to tell a greater story: That all these things came together to point to Jesus as the Christ, and this is why we celebrate Christmas. The traditional church easily admits that December 25th was probably not Jesus' birthday. HWA made it sound like the church was trying to foist some kind of "big lie" on its members, when in fact, it's very open about this.

What I have seen over the years is a thankfulness and joy that Jesus came to earth to save us! But HWA tried to make us think that somehow Christians were celebrating the Feast of Saturnalia--going out and getting drunk, and gorging themselves on food, overspending, etc. (Sounds like the Feast of Booths, which many times from the pulpit was referenced as "the Feast of Booze" since members were admonished to control their drinking). I was made to believe that these poor "deceived" Christians were unwittingly worshipping the sun-god during the Winter Solstice, or worshipping their Christmas trees. This is totally untrue and a false accusation that has no merit. The focus is totally on Jesus as a Savior and the humble story of how He came into the world.

Anyway, I am realizing that the children in church are taught the truth about Jesus in detail, and the teachings are scripturally accurate. Just because I didn't know these things (or pay attention to them) didn't mean that the traditional church was "suppressing" this knowledge. I see that my ignorance of Scripture is what made me gullible to HWA's influence as he poisoned my mind with antagonistic arguments toward Christmas. I'm so glad I know better now. --Former member of WCG

Comment: Also see: If what HWA taught was false, should we go back to observing "pagan" holidays? (Q&A)


Could Write a Whole Book on My Experiences:

December 23, 2009

How does one respond, especially to the person who had no bad experiences? I could write a whole book on my experiences and have avoided doing so for two reasons: (1) I might forget some of these; (2) I don't want to bring up the past. However, here are two: I drove 125 miles one way to services with my wife and three kids and never missed a service. Yet in a snow storm at church the minister cancelled services but didn't call me. I went all that way for nothing. Another case, I went for Passover, and the minister put me outside the building to stand guard. I did so, but wondered did I drive 125 miles for this? This minister was a real rotten one. --Name withheld


You Have Some of the Best Articles I've Seen:

December 23, 2009

I want to thank you for your website. It has some of the best articles I've seen and I even found it clearer than Rick Ross's website. I hope your website is maintained and more links direct to it. Thank you. -- Anonymous


Email Us

Letter Archives

Return to top