|
The most successful proponent of
British-Israelism in the 1930's to 1970's was Herbert W. Armstrong.
He claimed that identify of the American and British people in Biblical
prophecies was possible through the "now discovered Master Key."1
This article is helpful for any who have been taught the theory of BI
and who may have questions.
Also see in depth ESN article:
Where Are the Tribes
of Israel Located? (A Critique of Herman Hoeh's Article) (shows Hoeh didn't
have his facts straight)
The Theory of British-Israelism
The theory of
British-Israelism was once a main doctrine of the
Worldwide Church of God (founded by Herbert W. Armstrong). The current leadership has
since discarded this teaching as biblically incorrect. However, many
offshoot groups of the WCG have clung to all the doctrines held by the
late Herbert W. Armstrong, and so still accept this teaching. Some
Christians are also influenced by this teaching, and need to take a
closer look at it.
The book, The United
States and the British Commonwealth in Prophecy outlines the teaching that Britain and the United States are the lost
ten tribes of Israel. In this teaching of "British-Israelism,"
the tribe of Ephraim becomes Great Britain, Manasseh is the United
States, and the throne of David is the throne of England.
Herbert W. Armstrong published
this theory as his own special revelation from God. Recent evidence has
surfaced that shows plagiarism from J. H. Allen's book, "Judah's
Scepter and Joseph's Birthright," a 375-page book published in 1902
and copyrighted in 1917.
This book was written a full
thirty years before Armstrong claimed to have
made an "exhaustive" study of the British-Israelism issue.
Only a Theory
The theory teaches
that when God's people returned to Palestine after the
captivity, only the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and Levi really returned.
The "House of Israel," meaning the ten lost tribes,2 scattered.
By Jesus' day, supposedly only three tribes were represented. According
to the theory, the "House of Israel" was missing.
The Bible
Speaks
The Apostle Peter was, however,
unaware of British-Israelism teaching, since he uttered these words in
Acts 2: 36:
"Therefore let all the house
of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom
ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ."
In the BI theory, the
judgments against Israel naturally become directed towards the United
States. We thus find the belief that America will cease to be a nation,
and her citizens will be removed, finding themselves in captivity. (Plain
Truth, July 1959, p. 16).
The Bible teaches that a
prophet is false when his words fail to come to pass. (See Deut.18:20-22). Time has already run out for this prophecy, since it was
foretold for 1972 in the publications of Herbert W. Armstrong. The
theory of British-Israelism falls with the prophecy, and the prophet.
Are
"Israel" and "Jew" Always Different?
Armstrong taught
that "Israel" and "Jew" were two separate nations.
"Jew" always meant "The House of Judah," and "Israel"
meant "the lost ten tribes." 2 Kings 17:18-23 is a favorite
passage of British-Israelism devotees, so let's consider it.
"So the Lord was very
angry with Israel, and removed them out of his sight: there was none left but the tribe of Judah only. Also Judah keep not
the commandments of the Lord their God, but walked in the statutes of
Israel which they made.
And the Lord rejected all the
seed of Israel, and afflicted them, and delivered them into the hand
of spoilers, until he had cast them out of his sight.
For he rent Israel from the
house of David; and they made Jeroboam the son of Nebat king:
and Jeroboam drave Israel from following the Lord, and made them sin a
great sin..
For the children
of Israel walked in all the sins of Jeroboam, which he did; they
departed not from them; until the Lord removed Israel out of his
sight, as he had said by all his servants the prophets. So was Israel
carried away out of their own land to Assyria unto this day."
Notice the last phrase of this Scripture. Israel went as far as Assyria until this day! They relocated,
but not far away, certainly not across oceans! Certainly not scattered
far afield!
The Rebuilding Of Jerusalem
in Nehemiah's Day
According to the
British-Israelism theory only Jews should have been participating in
rebuilding Jerusalem since the house of Israel was "long
gone." Yet Ezra uses the words "all Israel" several times
in the account. (Ezra 2:70; 6:17; 8:25,35; 10:5; Nehemiah 7:73; 12:47).
Evidently the terms "Jew" and "Israel" were used
interchangeably, thus spoiling the unsupported theory of
British-Israelism.
The Ten Tribes in Christ's
Day
If the ten tribes were gone by
Christ's day, how does the BI theory explain that Anna the Prophetess
was of the tribe of Asher? (Luke 2:36). Paul mentioned all twelve
tribes. (Acts 26:6,7). James mentioned all twelve tribes. (James 1:1).
The book of Revelation tells of
12,000 people from each of the twelve tribes of Israel. (Revelation
7:4-8). All Israel shall be saved, eventually. (Romans 11:26).
Upon consulting a
Jewish rabbi, he assured me the list in Revelation was a literal one, as
are the other lists in the Bible, although they differ from one another
for various reasons. The Revelation list is not "figurative"
or "spiritual" allowing for interpretation to apply to some
other nation, but applies to literal Israel.
Consider the
Apostle Paul
The Apostle Paul was addressed
in three ways:
- As a Hebrew (Phil. 3:5).
- As an Israelite (2 Cor.
11:22).
- As a Jew (Acts 21:39;
22:3).
Obviously, Paul recognized no
such distinctions as invented by this theory. All terms interchange.
Christ the King
Since Christ had a sign over
his head on the crucifixion reading "King of the Jews3," are we
to assume that He was King for Judah only? No, for the Scriptures are
plain that Jesus Christ was the promised Messiah for all Israel. The disciples
understood this when they questioned Him in Acts 16, "Lord, is it
at this time You are restoring the Kingdom to Israel?"
Obviously, "Jew" and
"Israel" were used interchangeably in Christ's day.
After putting up the sign, "King of the Jews," His mockers
then said, "...if He be the King of Israel, let him now come down
from the cross, and we will believe Him" (Matthew 27:42). Again,
the terms interchange.
Problems With the Stone
British-Israelism claims that
the stone under the Queen of England's coronation chair is the very
"pillar stone of Jacob" which was first transported by Jacob,
and finally by Jeremiah to the British Isles, via Egypt.
The Scriptures know nothing of
this invented event! We would expect, if the
theory is correct, that the English coronation stone could be analyzed
and found to be of the type found in Israel. The stone has been analyzed
and "The Marson Report " [by Richard A. Marson] page 128, records:
"The stone in Westminster
Abbey has been analyzed and shown to be a calcareous type of red
sandstone of Scottish origin."
Conclusions
on British-Israelism
British-Israelism is not a
revelation from God as some teach. Rather it is a theory that cannot
stand up to Biblical or scientific examination. It should be rejected by
those professing Christianity.
--Article submitted by former member of
Worldwide Church of God
NOTE:
The Lia Fail (Stone of
Destiny) is of Irish myth. According to the legend it was supposed to
"roar" if a true king touched it. David Williams, in an
article on BI, noted that “Professor A.C. Ramsey of the Geology
Department of London University inspected the "coronation" stone
and identified it as red sandstone, probably of Scottish origin. "The
nearest red sandstone to Bethel, where Jacob found his stone is in Petra,
nearly one hundred miles to the south; the stone around Bethel where Jacob
slept is white limestone.” In 1996, British Prime Minister John Major
said, “The stone of destiny holds a special place in the hearts of the
Scots. I believe that on this, the 700th anniversary of its removal from
Scotland, it’s appropriate to return it to it’s historic homeland.”
The key
verses used by BI proponents are identical to the ones HWA used--and
distorted. Their premise is that the ten tribes of Israel were
"lost" and today are found in the Anglo-Saxons. The theory
fosters racial and national pride. No matter who we are, if we are in
Christ Jesus, our future is not linked to a particular land or race, but to an
incorruptible inheritance. (I Peter 1:4) The Davidic Covenant was
fulfilled in Jesus, the Son of God, and the Word of God is clear that we
are to seek Him.
Notice
to former members: Believing
that the United States and Britain were modern Israel may have been what
started getting many heavily involved in the WCG or one of its
offshoots or splinter groups. It
can become a part of one's self-worth (thinking we are special, chosen, the
elite, etc.) Learning the truth about these things can be a huge letdown,
but we must come see our special
position in Christ.
For further study, see
offsite links at the end of this page.
Recommended
books:
The Delusion of British Israelism by Anton Darms. Available
through Barnes & Noble out
of print, used & rare books
The History of the Ten "Lost" Tribes by David Baron (This is
a classic work on the subject).
Rare; check your library or used book stores.
Armstrongism: The "Worldwide Church of
God" Examined in the Searching Light of Scripture by Dr. Robert L.
Sumner. (Chapter 8: "The Armstrong Teaching About Israel"
covers Herbert Armstrong's Anglo-Israel theory.)
The Armstrong Empire
by Joseph Hopkins
(See Chapter 5: "The United States and British Commonwealth in
Prophecy.")
Footnotes by ESN:
1
Herbert W. Armstrong, The United States and British Commonwealth,
1967, p. 4.
2
HWA referred often to the "ten
lost tribes," but these words are not found in the Bible. See our
article, Where Are the Tribes of Israel Located?
3 Strong's Exhaustive Concordance states that the word for "Jew" in these verses means "Judah" in the sense of
a country: Jew: Greek word #2453 loudaios (ee-oo-dah`-yos);
from #2448 (in the sense of #2455 as a country); Judaean, i.e.,
belonging to Jehudah ["Judah"]: KJV--Jew (-ess), of Judaea.
Did Herbert W.
Armstrong
Say God Revealed the "Key to Unlocking Prophecy" to Him Alone?
Armstrong
Charged With Plagiarizing "U.S. And Britain in Prophecy" (offsite link)
How is the Term Israel Used in the New Testament?
(Shows how the church is not "spiritual
Israel") (also covers Gal 6:16)
[offsite
link]
A
Comparison and Contrast Between Israel and the Church [offsite
link]
The
Origin of British Israelism (Examines
BI in much detail) [offsite link]
Article showing
British-Israelism has documented pagan druidic roots
(scroll about 2/3 of the way down the page
to where the sentence starts with "Brothers supposedly...") [offsite
link]
Where
are Tribes of Israel Located? (A Critique of Herman Hoeh's Article)
[shows Hoeh didn't have his facts
straight)
The Conspiracy Was Strong - The Discernment Ministries
(Herbert W. Armstrong is mentioned in
Parts 1-3 of this in-depth report--search for the words "Worldwide Church of
God; covers the British-Israelism
movement.) [offsite link]
Back
to Questioning Herbert W. Armstrong
(was he who he said he was?)
Return
to top
|